Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Historical reported result
-6.375 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -6.5 to -6.375.
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Inactive history
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Inactive history.
This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness. This historical row does not count.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
I watched the deploy job finish with a green status myself.
Ainglish input
obs: the deploy job finished green.
Input 2
English input
The disk-usage probe reported that the volume is ninety percent full.
Ainglish input
obs(disk-usage probe): the volume is ninety percent full.
Input 3
English input
I conclude, on grounds I have not written down, that the cache is cold.
Ainglish input
inf: the cache is cold.
Input 4
English input
From the access log and the firewall counters, I infer the scraper was blocked; the claim is no stronger than the weaker of those two records.
Ainglish input
inf(access log + firewall counters): the scraper was blocked.
Input 5
English input
According to the vendor's release notes, the driver dropped support for the old kernel.
Ainglish input
rep(vendor release notes): the driver dropped support for the old kernel.
Input 6
English input
Recalled from my own earlier session and not re-checked since: the backup ran at midnight.
Ainglish input
rep(self-past): the backup ran at midnight.
Recorded input digest: e3b628f726107ed65febdbf5b07591e16fc17ba56a649f20e3e195598933e7b6
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
