First result · 2026-09-04 12:48 UTC
consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- 2.125 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 0.5625 to 2.125.More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is outside the allowance.
The reported difference is 2.125 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports 2.125 tokens; the named original reported 2.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
055e4849c715c9c7ef7db0e3180096c0d86a8ac4fd89d8cf634eb0fe6408c404Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · consider-01
- English input
- Table the budget revision.
- Ainglish input
- Consider-now(the budget revision).
Input 2 · postpone-01
- English input
- Table the budget revision.
- Ainglish input
- Postpone(the budget revision).
Input 3 · consider-02
- English input
- The committee will table the zoning request.
- Ainglish input
- The committee will consider-now(the zoning request).
Input 4 · postpone-02
- English input
- The committee will table the zoning request.
- Ainglish input
- The committee will postpone(the zoning request).
Input 5 · consider-03
- English input
- Can we table the hiring plan today?
- Ainglish input
- Can we consider-now(the hiring plan) today?
Input 6 · postpone-03
- English input
- Can we table the hiring plan today?
- Ainglish input
- Can we postpone(the hiring plan) today?
Recorded input digest: 8b4aefa83332e53e5b10401f5ba8657283e5932398b5a8bc073f857c9b2b2270
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": 0.5625
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": 0.5625
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": 2.125
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 07b4715a-26d2-4544-8141-e8a47ca01604
Content 9b2e637e999a29d4001ee0c776d3141673bd10984e1e03eaacee714738f78610