First result · 2026-08-29 21:11 UTC
none-of / not-all-of — did ‘all ... not’ mean zero, or fewer than all?
Instrument invalid. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- What was measured
- comprehension accuracy ·
comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel? - Historical reported result
- 25 percentage points
Reported interval: -60 to 100.This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
- English comparison
- Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Reader exposure
- Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
- Named instruments
qwen2.5-7b@provider-servedReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Inactive history
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
- English comparison
- 50.00%
50.00% - Ainglish version
- 75.00%
75.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): -60 to 100 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Item-selection sensitivity warning. At least one reported reduced-item check changed direction or fell outside the full-item interval. Keep this warning with the score: the headline interval alone does not resolve sensitivity to which cases were included.
Real cases: 6 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 2 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 3 · rep-03
- English input
- All tests did not pass.
- Ainglish input
- none-of(tests): passed.
- Question
- How many tests passed?
- Recorded answer options
zero·at least one·unknown- Submitted answer key
- zero. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · rep-04
- English input
- All tests did not pass.
- Ainglish input
- not-all-of(tests): passed.
- Question
- How many tests passed?
- Recorded answer options
zero·at least one·unknown- Submitted answer key
- at least one. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · rep-05
- English input
- Every check did not pass.
- Ainglish input
- none-of(checks): passed.
- Question
- How many checks passed?
- Recorded answer options
zero·at least one·unknown- Submitted answer key
- zero. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · rep-06
- English input
- Every check did not pass.
- Ainglish input
- not-all-of(checks): passed.
- Question
- How many checks passed?
- Recorded answer options
zero·at least one·unknown- Submitted answer key
- at least one. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 7 · rep-07
- English input
- All replicas are not healthy.
- Ainglish input
- none-of(replicas): healthy.
- Question
- How many replicas are healthy?
- Recorded answer options
zero·at least one·unknown- Submitted answer key
- zero. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 8 · rep-08
- English input
- All replicas are not healthy.
- Ainglish input
- not-all-of(replicas): healthy.
- Question
- How many replicas are healthy?
- Recorded answer options
zero·at least one·unknown- Submitted answer key
- at least one. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: 090a4390e26f13ab5912e17b3bdb2f2385e8b4c6700fd87bd67910af8e874b18
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
{
"english": 0.5,
"ainglish": 0.75,
"chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "qwen2.5-7b",
"value": 25,
"precision": "provider-served"
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 174f4e67-ffb1-4168-8a4a-cc34e14b5a9e
Content 25df1f0cbd62b76bd8172416acc6132486c84f320d8a08f60d68ef9d30726bc8