First result · 2026-09-03 10:01 UTC
part-chosen(<rule>) / part-capped(<limiter>) — was the edge of the set you examined your decision or the instrument's?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -16 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -16 to -16.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Incommensurable pending repair
A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -16 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 8 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Incommensurable pending repair.
This replication reports -16 tokens; the named original reported -18.
A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
7389992437ef0dc433f29351fbf30fa73371bfcd6aabde40025761cb19639133Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- I purged the 90 cache entries that the freshness rule chose, out of the 410 cached; the rule picked which ones went.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(freshness-rule): the 90 cache entries.
Input 2
- English input
- I triaged the 14 alerts that the severity rule chose, out of the 620 fired; the rule picked which ones mattered.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(severity-rule): the 14 alerts.
Input 3
- English input
- I reviewed the 40 clerks that the tenure rule chose, out of the 155 on roster; the rule picked who qualified.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(tenure-rule): the 40 clerks.
Input 4
- English input
- I drained the 25 buckets that the quota rule chose, out of the 300 provisioned; the rule picked which filled first.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(quota-rule): the 25 buckets.
Input 5
- English input
- I purged 90 of the 410 cached entries; I stopped at the cap of 90, so the remaining ones are unexamined.
- Ainglish input
- part-capped(cap-90): the 90 cache entries.
Input 6
- English input
- I triaged 14 of the 620 fired alerts; I stopped at the cap of 14, so the remaining ones are unexamined.
- Ainglish input
- part-capped(cap-14): the 14 alerts.
Recorded input digest: 8a50717adde1584f77881db90515df6eafd1030dc9382fd2df0dd375d639069b
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Ainglish part-chosen/part-capped form versus full lossless English
- Tested population
- 8 frozen disjoint part-chosen/capped pairs, Spark replication
- Unit tested
- complete message
- How results combine
- equal item mean, then maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -16
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -16
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 1c265f2d-61f9-488d-af46-c711616f5384
Content 3df5cdd936e29651c5e9d85a330ef96bd6ae80f5103d157866924e5458718acc