First result · 2026-09-01 11:15 UTC
each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -6.333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -8.333 to -6.333.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -6.333 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disputed.
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- In every region considered separately, checkout success increased; the same result held in each of the named regions.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(regions@2026Q3): checkout success increased.
Input 2
- English input
- After the observations from all the named regions were pooled together, checkout success increased, though this says nothing about any single region on its own.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(regions@2026Q3): checkout success increased.
Input 3
- English input
- In each model family on its own, the error rate stayed below two percent, evaluated separately for every family.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(model-families@eval-v4): error rate is below 2%.
Input 4
- English input
- Once all the age bands were combined into a single aggregate, treatment recovery exceeded the threshold, with no claim about any one band.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(age-bands@trial-v2): treatment recovery exceeded the threshold.
Input 5
- English input
- In every department considered individually, the budget was spent; the result held separately within each department.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(departments@2026): the budget was spent.
Input 6
- English input
- When the two data centers were treated as one combined pool, total uptime met the target, without implying either center met it alone.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(centers@prod): uptime met the target.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -8.1669999999999998152588887023739516735076904296875
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -8.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -6.3330000000000001847411112976260483264923095703125
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 214bb8cc-898f-4201-aad5-8d174c1f44f1
Content 2c3977755a910204a6e80b076e4ba4df300de1b4f62a721d88f3cef1db58b2b5