Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.
This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.
Find experiments by proposal
What differs in the declared methods?
These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Only recorded on one side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
[
"lossless-mapping-in-context-v1"
]
Tested population · Only recorded on one side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
six fresh complete pairs balanced 3/3 across each-group and groups-combined, frozen before tokenizer exposure
Unit tested · Only recorded on one side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
complete sentence
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Only recorded on one side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least favourable token cost)"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-6.333 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -8.333 to -6.333.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
Reported token direction. Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Current declared cost bound: at most 3 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is within that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.
A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline non-control items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items omitted.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
In every region considered separately, checkout success increased; the same result held in each of the named regions.
After the observations from all the named regions were pooled together, checkout success increased, though this says nothing about any single region on its own.
In each model family on its own, the error rate stayed below two percent, evaluated separately for every family.
Ainglish input
each-group(model-families@eval-v4): error rate is below 2%.
Input 4
English input
Once all the age bands were combined into a single aggregate, treatment recovery exceeded the threshold, with no claim about any one band.
Ainglish input
groups-combined(age-bands@trial-v2): treatment recovery exceeded the threshold.
Input 5
English input
In every department considered individually, the budget was spent; the result held separately within each department.
Ainglish input
each-group(departments@2026): the budget was spent.
Input 6
English input
When the two data centers were treated as one combined pool, total uptime met the target, without implying either center met it alone.
Ainglish input
groups-combined(centers@prod): uptime met the target.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-14.833333333333 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -15.333333333333 to -14.833333333333.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Incommensurable pending repair
A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.
Reported token direction. Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Current declared cost bound: at most 3 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is within that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.
A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Showing 1–6 of 6 readable, inline non-control items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items omitted.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
For every island grid in island-grids@storm-echo-41, evaluated separately under the declared method, reserve stayed above 30%; no pooled result is asserted.
When observations for all research labs in research-labs@cycle-saffron-12 are combined under the declared aggregation, contamination rate fell; no lab-specific result is asserted.
For every orchard block in orchard-blocks@harvest-cobalt-27, evaluated separately under the declared method, yield exceeded baseline; no pooled result is asserted.
When observations for all harbour terminals in harbour-terminals@shift-lilac-08 are combined under the declared aggregation, queue time decreased; no terminal-specific result is asserted.
Ainglish input
groups-combined(harbour-terminals@shift-lilac-08): queue time decreased.
Input 5
English input
For every drone fleet in drone-fleets@trial-quartz-19, evaluated separately under the declared method, mission completion met the target; no pooled result is asserted.
Ainglish input
each-group(drone-fleets@trial-quartz-19): mission completion met the target.
Input 6
English input
When observations for all aquifer zones in aquifer-zones@survey-ember-63 are combined under the declared aggregation, nitrate concentration stayed below the limit; no zone-specific result is asserted.
Ainglish input
groups-combined(aquifer-zones@survey-ember-63): nitrate concentration stayed below the limit.
Recorded input digest: 7d64e6b7dc16e8afe5f64af9f615b92274e7aa1a92eec624884fefbff3f20afb
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
the complete Ainglish sentence with an exact finite group-set reference versus a fuller lossless ordinary-English sentence preserving that reference, the same clause, per-group versus pooled evaluation scope, and the opposite-scope non-implication
Tested population
six fresh complete pairs balanced 3/3 across each-group and groups-combined, frozen before tokenizer exposure
Unit tested
complete sentence
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least favourable token cost)
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
