Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve2026-09-07 07:38 UTC	text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve2026-09-14 14:32 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-22.1875 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -22.1875 to -22.1875Counts in current evidence decisions	-22 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -22.125 to -22Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.	Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordtoken cost · -22.1875 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-07 07:38 UTC

text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -22.1875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -22.1875 to -22.1875.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: You must copy the appeal clause into packet Juniper while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of clause@j91§4, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: copy the appeal clause into packet Juniper, text-fixed(clause@j91§4).

Input 2

English input: You must place the recovery command in runbook North while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of command@n18:L7, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: place the recovery command in runbook North, text-fixed(command@n18:L7).

Input 3

English input: You must archive the signed witness paragraph while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of witness@w42¶9, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: archive the signed witness paragraph, text-fixed(witness@w42¶9).

Input 4

English input: You must publish the checksum line in release 73 while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of digest@r73:L2, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: publish the checksum line in release 73, text-fixed(digest@r73:L2).

Input 5

English input: You must mirror the consent wording in cohort Umber while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of consent@u08§6, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: mirror the consent wording in cohort Umber, text-fixed(consent@u08§6).

Input 6

English input: You must insert the licence notice into bundle K while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of notice@k55¶1, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: insert the licence notice into bundle K, text-fixed(notice@k55¶1).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -22.1875
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -22.1875
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 2d072c94-de09-4cf1-9abe-417e91f1eb15
Content b360ddd030c7ec1360be1b94a033c02b8f08fd677cb5349545a0a833bb4127e9

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -22 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-14 14:32 UTC

text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: -22 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -22.125 to -22.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -22 tokens; the named original reported -22.1875.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

0 of 16 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 16 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

b360ddd030c7ec1360be1b94a033c02b8f08fd677cb5349545a0a833bb4127e9

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: You must copy the quarantine instruction into checklist Quartz while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of instruction@q47§3, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: copy the quarantine instruction into checklist Quartz, text-fixed(instruction@q47§3).

Input 2

English input: You must place the cryptographic challenge in protocol Amber while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of challenge@a26:L5, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: place the cryptographic challenge in protocol Amber, text-fixed(challenge@a26:L5).

Input 3

English input: You must archive the signed waiver paragraph while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of waiver@z84¶2, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: archive the signed waiver paragraph, text-fixed(waiver@z84¶2).

Input 4

English input: You must publish the compatibility notice in release 94 while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of notice@r94:L8, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: publish the compatibility notice in release 94, text-fixed(notice@r94:L8).

Input 5

English input: You must mirror the enrolment wording in cohort Cobalt while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of assent@c72§9, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: mirror the enrolment wording in cohort Cobalt, text-fixed(assent@c72§9).

Input 6

English input: You must insert the patent declaration into package V while preserving the exact decoded Unicode sequence of declaration@v31¶6, including case, punctuation, whitespace, line breaks, spelling, and normalization.
Ainglish input: req: insert the patent declaration into package V, text-fixed(declaration@v31¶6).

Recorded input digest: 523baf7640fe9edfd459a5faa86d3c4136dabb1464e106acdf9146c0bc4cfee0

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -22.125
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -22
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt f5a86fec-4d2c-4981-b158-c488b95870ab
Content 71b34ee89e96a07a2e6fb9be10a809f59786be97e8b951643a0aeebabeb2117a

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.