These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
24 frozen complete claim-condition mappings across 24 operational domains
Second result
24 frozen complete claim-condition mappings across 24 operational domains
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
one complete condition-bounded claim
Second result
one complete condition-bounded claim
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the literal given_c stratum"
}
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the literal given_c stratum"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
{
"id": "given_c",
"weight": 1
}
]
Second result
[
{
"id": "given_c",
"weight": 1
}
]
First result: full recordtoken cost · -16.291666666667 tokens per declared item
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-16.291666666667 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -18.333333333333 to -16.291666666667.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 1 declared conditions
given_c
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
given_c
-16.291666666667
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · pump-self-test
English input
The infusion pump passes its self-test only while firmware 6.2 runs diagnostics profile Alder; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the infusion pump passes its self-test given_c(firmware 6.2 runs diagnostics profile Alder).
Condition
given_c
Input 2 · customs-total
English input
The customs total reconciles only while rate table Beryl applies to every declared line; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the customs total reconciles given_c(rate table Beryl applies to every declared line).
Condition
given_c
Input 3 · evacuation-route
English input
The evacuation route remains usable only while stairwell Cedar stays clear and unlocked; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the evacuation route remains usable given_c(stairwell Cedar stays clear and unlocked).
Condition
given_c
Input 4 · catalogue-query
English input
The catalogue query is exhaustive only while index snapshot D-44 includes every accessioned record; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the catalogue query is exhaustive given_c(index snapshot D-44 includes every accessioned record).
Condition
given_c
Input 5 · forecast-bound
English input
The rainfall forecast meets its error bound only while gauge cluster Elm retains calibration grade A; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the rainfall forecast meets its error bound given_c(gauge cluster Elm retains calibration grade A).
Condition
given_c
Input 6 · ballot-export
English input
The ballot export is complete only while precinct Fern has uploaded its signed final batch; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the ballot export is complete given_c(precinct Fern has uploaded its signed final batch).
Condition
given_c
Recorded input digest: 9910342a55d06dfac98d3e160c8187e29284137a8fa1e9992a073b588bf4b621
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
X given_c(C) versus complete careful English stating both silence outside C and non-assertion that C holds
Tested population
24 frozen complete claim-condition mappings across 24 operational domains
Unit tested
one complete condition-bounded claim
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the literal given_c stratum
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-16.541666666667 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -18.208333333333 to -16.541666666667.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 1 declared conditions
given_c
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -16.541666666667 tokens; the named original reported -16.291666666667.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
0 of 24 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 24 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
given_c
-16.541666666667
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ex-given-20260919-device-clock
English input
The electrocardiograph clock stays synchronized only while bench reference Meridian supplies the timing pulses; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the electrocardiograph clock stays synchronized given_c(bench reference Meridian supplies the timing pulses).
Condition
given_c
Input 2 · ex-given-20260919-cargo-origin
English input
The shipment qualifies for the declared tariff category only while origin certificate Rill covers all assembled components; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the shipment qualifies for the declared tariff category given_c(origin certificate Rill covers all assembled components).
Condition
given_c
Input 3 · ex-given-20260919-smoke-fan
English input
The smoke extraction fan meets its airflow specification only while test configuration Nacre leaves the intake grilles unobstructed; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the smoke extraction fan meets its airflow specification given_c(test configuration Nacre leaves the intake grilles unobstructed).
Condition
given_c
Input 4 · ex-given-20260919-author-index
English input
The author index resolves every pseudonym only while authority file Ember includes the latest name merges; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the author index resolves every pseudonym given_c(authority file Ember includes the latest name merges).
Condition
given_c
Input 5 · ex-given-20260919-frost-alert
English input
The frost alert covers the entire valley only while station network Mallow reports from all elevation bands; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the frost alert covers the entire valley given_c(station network Mallow reports from all elevation bands).
Condition
given_c
Input 6 · ex-given-20260919-voter-roll
English input
The eligibility list contains no duplicate registration only while deduplication rule Citrine uses the current district boundaries; outside that condition this sentence makes no claim, and it does not establish that the condition holds.
Ainglish input
the eligibility list contains no duplicate registration given_c(deduplication rule Citrine uses the current district boundaries).
Condition
given_c
Recorded input digest: 94a7c8f6cda9e50fafeff869e953e9ebee832fa2eb62a63b80bb426da839d8be
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
X given_c(C) versus complete careful English stating both silence outside C and non-assertion that C holds
Tested population
24 frozen complete claim-condition mappings across 24 operational domains
Unit tested
one complete condition-bounded claim
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the literal given_c stratum
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
