First result · 2026-09-30 16:00 UTC
review-due(t; by=reviewer) — a review deadline is not an expiry date
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -8.875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -10.625 to -8.875.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 8 declared conditions
access-grants,policy-exceptions,risk-acceptances,model-evaluations,certificates,deployment-approvals,contracts,data-retention-rulesAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -8.875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
access-grants | -8.875 | Not recorded |
policy-exceptions | -8.875 | Not recorded |
risk-acceptances | -8.875 | Not recorded |
model-evaluations | -8.875 | Not recorded |
certificates | -8.875 | Not recorded |
deployment-approvals | -8.875 | Not recorded |
contracts | -8.875 | Not recorded |
data-retention-rules | -8.875 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 64 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-1
- English input
- Operative access grant Archive-601: Arden must review by 2027-01-11T00:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
- Ainglish input
- Operative access grant Archive-601 review-due(2027-01-11T00:00:00Z; by=Arden).
- Condition
- access-grants
Input 2 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-2
- English input
- Operative access grant Sensor-602: Bela must review by 2027-01-12T03:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
- Ainglish input
- Operative access grant Sensor-602 review-due(2027-01-12T03:00:00Z; by=Bela).
- Condition
- access-grants
Input 3 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-3
- English input
- Operative access grant Visitor-603: Cato must review by 2027-01-13T06:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
- Ainglish input
- Operative access grant Visitor-603 review-due(2027-01-13T06:00:00Z; by=Cato).
- Condition
- access-grants
Input 4 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-4
- English input
- Operative access grant Workshop-604: Dara must review by 2027-01-14T09:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
- Ainglish input
- Operative access grant Workshop-604 review-due(2027-01-14T09:00:00Z; by=Dara).
- Condition
- access-grants
Input 5 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-5
- English input
- Operative access grant Dataset-605: Elin must review by 2027-01-15T12:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
- Ainglish input
- Operative access grant Dataset-605 review-due(2027-01-15T12:00:00Z; by=Elin).
- Condition
- access-grants
Input 6 · ex-reviewdue-20260930-1-6
- English input
- Operative access grant Tunnel-606: Faris must review by 2027-01-16T15:00:00Z; lateness alone won't end it; no outcome promised.
- Ainglish input
- Operative access grant Tunnel-606 review-due(2027-01-16T15:00:00Z; by=Faris).
- Condition
- access-grants
Recorded input digest: 36fa2532e50b0e27b7944c22b01441fa948a50a3823f1f3ef0b25f97e4c49fb2
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Ainglish tokens minus complete careful-English tokens for the same meaning; negative values mean fewer tokens. Comparator explicitly preserves continuation despite lateness alone and no promised outcome.
- Tested population
- 64 prospectively authored review-only records, eight in each of eight equally weighted declared domains; one fixed complete-message renderer and three named tiktoken 0.14.0 encodings.
- Unit tested
- The complete English message and complete affirmative review-due message, with operative state, same reference, inclusive UTC review deadline and responsible reviewer. No external legend tokens.
- How results combine
- Mean paired token delta within each domain; equal-weight mean of eight domains for each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Report domain strata under that globally least-favourable tokenizer, plus all domain-by-tokenizer means. The declared prerequisite bound is at most +3 tokens.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -10.625
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -8.875
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -8.875
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "access-grants",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "policy-exceptions",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "risk-acceptances",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "model-evaluations",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "certificates",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "deployment-approvals",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "contracts",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "data-retention-rules",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.125,
"value": -8.875,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 38573888-1da3-4e5a-b0b6-960f214f8646
Content 50c70d40b8764a23de173e70172f271a161f387fc0fa2e75e7f46420da2f8cd6