Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
256 frozen stock-flow complete pairs from eight authored domain frames; equal form weights; shared schemas excluded from both cost arms; repeated templates are not independent language populations
Second result
256 frozen stock-flow complete pairs from eight authored domain frames; equal form weights; shared schemas excluded from both cost arms; repeated templates are not independent language populations
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
complete resolved claim sentence, with identical references and temporal spellings in both arms where applicable
Second result
complete resolved claim sentence, with identical references and temporal spellings in both arms where applicable
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "mean complete-pair difference within each tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; equal form strata retained separately"
}
Second result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "mean complete-pair difference within each tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; equal form strata retained separately"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    {
        "id": "remain-in",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "departed-from",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
Second result
[
    {
        "id": "remain-in",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "departed-from",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

First result · 2026-09-07 16:04 UTC

remain-in / departed-from — did ‘three agents left’ count who stayed or who went?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
2 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -1 to 2.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

remain-in, departed-from

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reported token direction. More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

Current declared cost bound: at most 4 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is within that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.

A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
remain-in0 Not recorded
departed-from4 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 256 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · s-0-00-remain-in

English input
Exactly 0 distinct workers are in S000 at 08:00Z, after changes effective then.
Ainglish input
Exactly 0 workers remain-in(S000) as_of(08:00Z).
Condition
remain-in

Input 2 · s-0-00-departed-from

English input
Exactly 0 distinct workers exited S000 during [07:00Z,08:00Z).
Ainglish input
Exactly 0 distinct workers departed-from(S000) during([07:00Z,08:00Z)).
Condition
departed-from

Input 3 · s-0-01-remain-in

English input
Exactly 3 distinct workers are in S001 at 08:15Z, after changes effective then.
Ainglish input
Exactly 3 workers remain-in(S001) as_of(08:15Z).
Condition
remain-in

Input 4 · s-0-01-departed-from

English input
Exactly 3 distinct workers exited S001 during [07:00Z,08:15Z).
Ainglish input
Exactly 3 distinct workers departed-from(S001) during([07:00Z,08:15Z)).
Condition
departed-from

Input 5 · s-0-02-remain-in

English input
Exactly 6 distinct workers are in S002 at 08:30Z, after changes effective then.
Ainglish input
Exactly 6 workers remain-in(S002) as_of(08:30Z).
Condition
remain-in

Input 6 · s-0-02-departed-from

English input
Exactly 6 distinct workers exited S002 during [07:00Z,08:30Z).
Ainglish input
Exactly 6 distinct workers departed-from(S002) during([07:00Z,08:30Z)).
Condition
departed-from

Recorded input digest: 9b841ab176f721bcf39abad10f095c7f68ed55ff7a5c6d326f1d9c577f337b53

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
registered surface versus concise semantically complete careful English; omitted inferences are not positive claims in either arm
Tested population
256 frozen stock-flow complete pairs from eight authored domain frames; equal form weights; shared schemas excluded from both cost arms; repeated templates are not independent language populations
Unit tested
complete resolved claim sentence, with identical references and temporal spellings in both arms where applicable
How results combine
mean complete-pair difference within each tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; equal form strata retained separately

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -1
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -1
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 2
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "remain-in",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 0,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "departed-from",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 4,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 38ceb6b9-5ef7-4749-81f2-443851ed772a
Content 88324788426f9d67c87d1c16e346aac502181a0d63fd5e82a25f56c2430aa8f1

Second result · 2026-09-08 07:39 UTC

remain-in / departed-from — did ‘three agents left’ count who stayed or who went?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
2 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -1 to 2.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

remain-in, departed-from

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reported token direction. More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

Current declared cost bound: at most 4 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is within that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.

A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

Declared target content identity88324788426f9d67c87d1c16e346aac502181a0d63fd5e82a25f56c2430aa8f1

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
remain-in0 Not recorded
departed-from4 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 256 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · n-0-00-remain-in

English input
Exactly 2 distinct inspectors are in N000 at 13:00Z, after changes effective then.
Ainglish input
Exactly 2 inspectors remain-in(N000) as_of(13:00Z).
Condition
remain-in

Input 2 · n-0-00-departed-from

English input
Exactly 1 distinct inspectors exited N000 during [12:00Z,13:00Z).
Ainglish input
Exactly 1 distinct inspectors departed-from(N000) during([12:00Z,13:00Z)).
Condition
departed-from

Input 3 · n-0-01-remain-in

English input
Exactly 5 distinct inspectors are in N001 at 13:15Z, after changes effective then.
Ainglish input
Exactly 5 inspectors remain-in(N001) as_of(13:15Z).
Condition
remain-in

Input 4 · n-0-01-departed-from

English input
Exactly 5 distinct inspectors exited N001 during [12:15Z,13:15Z).
Ainglish input
Exactly 5 distinct inspectors departed-from(N001) during([12:15Z,13:15Z)).
Condition
departed-from

Input 5 · n-0-02-remain-in

English input
Exactly 8 distinct inspectors are in N002 at 13:30Z, after changes effective then.
Ainglish input
Exactly 8 inspectors remain-in(N002) as_of(13:30Z).
Condition
remain-in

Input 6 · n-0-02-departed-from

English input
Exactly 9 distinct inspectors exited N002 during [12:30Z,13:30Z).
Ainglish input
Exactly 9 distinct inspectors departed-from(N002) during([12:30Z,13:30Z)).
Condition
departed-from

Recorded input digest: 55eb19cdee13c34f9a2acf7c1f3c416bba709518e4f5941522a7513f38f6a832

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
registered surface versus concise semantically complete careful English; omitted inferences are not positive claims in either arm
Tested population
256 frozen stock-flow complete pairs from eight authored domain frames; equal form weights; shared schemas excluded from both cost arms; repeated templates are not independent language populations
Unit tested
complete resolved claim sentence, with identical references and temporal spellings in both arms where applicable
How results combine
mean complete-pair difference within each tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; equal form strata retained separately

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -1
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -1
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 2
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "remain-in",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 0,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "departed-from",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 4,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt dcf6f5b0-7f80-4254-8879-012edb78cc21
Content 5a4909ade5b82e8f5ab748afc5d80b1682e45bf68a5c8c39ce6ce67e0ce449ad

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.