Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

First result · 2026-09-05 16:20 UTC

verdict-fail / no-verdict — did 'the check failed' judge the target, or fail to judge it?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured

comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?

Reported result

9.6 percentage points
Reported interval: 3.8179 to 15.7058.

The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.

English comparison

Ordinary “failed”, with a shared execution log

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Common context and complete facts retained in both arms; see immutable DESIGN.md for comparator scope

Reader exposure

Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label

Named instruments

mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

verdict-fail, no-verdict

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison: 81.10%
Ainglish version: 90.70%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Real cases: 256 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every declared condition, with its stored result. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	English accuracy	Ainglish accuracy
`verdict-fail`	1.8	84.25%	86.05%
`no-verdict`	17.4	77.95%	95.35%

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

No readable non-control input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used no inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. The website has not fetched or verified it. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

Recorded input digest: 750d2327a6774ae032d4d82c1882499e7606e3924b84f3f8954462e9efae3cf6

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.81100000000000005417888360170763917267322540283203125,
    "ainglish": 0.907000000000000028421709430404007434844970703125,
    "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": 4.09499999999999975131004248396493494510650634765625,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": 16.9549999999999982946974341757595539093017578125,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "verdict-fail",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 1.8000000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.8425000000000000266453525910037569701671600341796875,
            "ainglish": 0.8605000000000000426325641456060111522674560546875,
            "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    },
    {
        "id": "no-verdict",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 17.39999999999999857891452847979962825775146484375,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.77949999999999997069011214989586733281612396240234375,
            "ainglish": 0.9535000000000000142108547152020037174224853515625,
            "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 3c18b2a0-c7e5-4345-94d5-a2678ab4f592
Content b30f547a1a78dcab78863c38580b898f4c4b42adedb8de0b7ccfef9a00a566a7

Second result · 2026-09-05 16:29 UTC

verdict-fail / no-verdict — did 'the check failed' judge the target, or fail to judge it?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured

comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?

Reported result

-6.545 percentage points
Reported interval: -10.5283 to -2.6532.

The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.

English comparison

Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Common context and complete facts retained in both arms; see immutable DESIGN.md for comparator scope

Reader exposure

Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label

Named instruments

mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

verdict-fail, no-verdict

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Awaiting independent settlement

An original reports one result. It does not confirm itself.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison: 97.25%
Ainglish version: 90.70%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Real cases: 256 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every declared condition, with its stored result. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	English accuracy	Ainglish accuracy
`verdict-fail`	-13.95	100.00%	86.05%
`no-verdict`	0.86	94.49%	95.35%

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

No readable non-control input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used no inputs.

Recorded input digest: 927bcf9a7ad6bed3fac03b17c9b24dec5367823a61c4bf11c918cdab889053fb

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.97250000000000003108624468950438313186168670654296875,
    "ainglish": 0.907000000000000028421709430404007434844970703125,
    "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": -12.144999999999999573674358543939888477325439453125,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m",
        "value": -0.059999999999999997779553950749686919152736663818359375,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "verdict-fail",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -13.949999999999999289457264239899814128875732421875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 1,
            "ainglish": 0.8605000000000000426325641456060111522674560546875,
            "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
        },
        "resolution_bound": "resolvable"
    },
    {
        "id": "no-verdict",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 0.85999999999999998667732370449812151491641998291015625,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": {
            "english": 0.94489999999999996216359932077466510236263275146484375,
            "ainglish": 0.9535000000000000142108547152020037174224853515625,
            "chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
        },
        "resolution_bound": "ceiling"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 90e081d0-f61d-4c9b-aa98-dc696574bbc2
Content 13d19d90366a789667e34c859f06a12e25a48d910d217343d82ae0bd6d30a359

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.