Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?2026-09-08 18:35 UTC	consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?2026-09-09 19:57 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-8.5 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -8.5 to -8.5Counts in current evidence decisions	-8.5 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -8.5 to -8.5Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.	Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Same recorded value

First result

Prospectively authored complete procedural mappings: 8 declared domains, 4 new matter references per domain, each in consider-now and postpone. Natural-language matter labels are identical in both arms; same English templates and equal form/domain weights.

Second result

Prospectively authored complete procedural mappings: 8 declared domains, 4 new matter references per domain, each in consider-now and postpone. Natural-language matter labels are identical in both arms; same English templates and equal form/domain weights.

Unit tested · Same recorded value

First result

one complete meaning-matched utterance pair including all shared contextual text

Second result

one complete meaning-matched utterance pair including all shared contextual text

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Same recorded value

First result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "Equal-weight form/force strata, equal domain/reference cells within each stratum; maximum tokenizer mean is the least-favourable headline. No rounding."
}

Second result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "Equal-weight form/force strata, equal domain/reference cells within each stratum; maximum tokenizer mean is the least-favourable headline. No rounding."
}

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    {
        "id": "consider-now",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "postpone",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

Second result

[
    {
        "id": "consider-now",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "postpone",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

First result: full recordtoken cost · -8.5 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-08 18:35 UTC

consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-8.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -8.5 to -8.5.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

consider-now, postpone

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -8.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`consider-now`	-5	Not recorded
`postpone`	-12	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 64 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · `public-governance-1-consider-now`

English input: Put the clinic-hearing motion before this meeting for consideration now.
Ainglish input: consider-now(the clinic-hearing motion).
Condition: consider-now

Input 2 · `public-governance-1-postpone`

English input: Do not take the clinic-hearing motion up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
Ainglish input: postpone(the clinic-hearing motion).
Condition: postpone

Input 3 · `public-governance-2-consider-now`

English input: Put the bus-route review before this meeting for consideration now.
Ainglish input: consider-now(the bus-route review).
Condition: consider-now

Input 4 · `public-governance-2-postpone`

English input: Do not take the bus-route review up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
Ainglish input: postpone(the bus-route review).
Condition: postpone

Input 5 · `public-governance-3-consider-now`

English input: Put the allotment budget before this meeting for consideration now.
Ainglish input: consider-now(the allotment budget).
Condition: consider-now

Input 6 · `public-governance-3-postpone`

English input: Do not take the allotment budget up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
Ainglish input: postpone(the allotment budget).
Condition: postpone

Recorded input digest: d90674723e2488ae82a675219d9e63ee879d88164d9d028d17f8867f5ed6b0b5

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: Ainglish minus complete careful English in current tokenizer units; negative is fewer tokens, positive is a premium
Tested population: Prospectively authored complete procedural mappings: 8 declared domains, 4 new matter references per domain, each in consider-now and postpone. Natural-language matter labels are identical in both arms; same English templates and equal form/domain weights.
Unit tested: one complete meaning-matched utterance pair including all shared contextual text
How results combine: Equal-weight form/force strata, equal domain/reference cells within each stratum; maximum tokenizer mean is the least-favourable headline. No rounding.

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -8.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -8.5
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "consider-now",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "postpone",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -12,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 3d8b4ad8-749e-4fc7-aeba-5c97f6b4590e
Content 731894e988bbb6a473703d55ba259d137fe53ace009c7e792345edd2e036161a

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -8.5 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-09 19:57 UTC

consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-8.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -8.5 to -8.5.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

consider-now, postpone

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -8.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -8.5 tokens; the named original reported -8.5.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

Declared target content identity

731894e988bbb6a473703d55ba259d137fe53ace009c7e792345edd2e036161a

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`consider-now`	-5	Not recorded
`postpone`	-12	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 64 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · `sat-public-governance-1-consider-now`

English input: Put the flood-shelter protocol before this meeting for consideration now.
Ainglish input: consider-now(the flood-shelter protocol).
Condition: consider-now

Input 2 · `sat-public-governance-1-postpone`

English input: Do not take the flood-shelter protocol up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
Ainglish input: postpone(the flood-shelter protocol).
Condition: postpone

Input 3 · `sat-public-governance-2-consider-now`

English input: Put the tree-preservation appeal before this meeting for consideration now.
Ainglish input: consider-now(the tree-preservation appeal).
Condition: consider-now

Input 4 · `sat-public-governance-2-postpone`

English input: Do not take the tree-preservation appeal up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
Ainglish input: postpone(the tree-preservation appeal).
Condition: postpone

Input 5 · `sat-public-governance-3-consider-now`

English input: Put the night-bus timetable before this meeting for consideration now.
Ainglish input: consider-now(the night-bus timetable).
Condition: consider-now

Input 6 · `sat-public-governance-3-postpone`

English input: Do not take the night-bus timetable up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
Ainglish input: postpone(the night-bus timetable).
Condition: postpone

Recorded input digest: a59e4a761b27ff816472245120a1385d595201be88fb2829d41bb58d3739d45b

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: Ainglish minus complete careful English in current tokenizer units; negative is fewer tokens, positive is a premium
Tested population: Prospectively authored complete procedural mappings: 8 declared domains, 4 new matter references per domain, each in consider-now and postpone. Natural-language matter labels are identical in both arms; same English templates and equal form/domain weights.
Unit tested: one complete meaning-matched utterance pair including all shared contextual text
How results combine: Equal-weight form/force strata, equal domain/reference cells within each stratum; maximum tokenizer mean is the least-favourable headline. No rounding.

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -8.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -8.5
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "consider-now",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "postpone",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -12,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 25c10c03-d82b-4ebd-84e0-365aec7a01f9
Content b30e88926bdcd28d8e8b0765e5735501ff4ff4302c64f07f5ad26e5856ed3563

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.

Compare two experiments

Find experiments by proposal

Compare the essentials

consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Input 1 · public-governance-1-consider-now

Input 2 · public-governance-1-postpone

Input 3 · public-governance-2-consider-now

Input 4 · public-governance-2-postpone

Input 5 · public-governance-3-consider-now

Input 6 · public-governance-3-postpone

Absolute arm results

Reader or tokenizer results

Condition results

consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Input 1 · sat-public-governance-1-consider-now

Input 2 · sat-public-governance-1-postpone

Input 3 · sat-public-governance-2-consider-now

Input 4 · sat-public-governance-2-postpone

Input 5 · sat-public-governance-3-consider-now

Input 6 · sat-public-governance-3-postpone

Absolute arm results

Reader or tokenizer results

Condition results

Input 1 · `public-governance-1-consider-now`

Input 2 · `public-governance-1-postpone`

Input 3 · `public-governance-2-consider-now`

Input 4 · `public-governance-2-postpone`

Input 5 · `public-governance-3-consider-now`

Input 6 · `public-governance-3-postpone`

Input 1 · `sat-public-governance-1-consider-now`

Input 2 · `sat-public-governance-1-postpone`

Input 3 · `sat-public-governance-2-consider-now`

Input 4 · `sat-public-governance-2-postpone`

Input 5 · `sat-public-governance-3-consider-now`

Input 6 · `sat-public-governance-3-postpone`