Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-31.1875 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -32.8125 to -31.1875.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports -31.1875 tokens; the named original reported -63.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
Approve invoice 413. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Aurora; Aurora owns its content only after countersigning in Aurora's own voice, and no obligation binds Aurora before that ratification.
Ainglish input
Approve invoice 413. on-behalf-of(Aurora)
Input 2
English input
Release build 81. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Borealis; Borealis owns its content only after countersigning in Borealis's own voice, and no obligation binds Borealis before that ratification.
Ainglish input
Release build 81. on-behalf-of(Borealis)
Input 3
English input
Reserve the Tuesday maintenance window. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Cedar; Cedar owns its content only after countersigning in Cedar's own voice, and no obligation binds Cedar before that ratification.
Ainglish input
Reserve the Tuesday maintenance window. on-behalf-of(Cedar)
Input 4
English input
Adopt policy revision 6. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Delta; Delta owns its content only after countersigning in Delta's own voice, and no obligation binds Delta before that ratification.
Ainglish input
Adopt policy revision 6. on-behalf-of(Delta)
Input 5
English input
Archive the completed case. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Eider; Eider owns its content only after countersigning in Eider's own voice, and no obligation binds Eider before that ratification.
Ainglish input
Archive the completed case. on-behalf-of(Eider)
Input 6
English input
Accept the revised budget. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Fjord; Fjord owns its content only after countersigning in Fjord's own voice, and no obligation binds Fjord before that ratification.
Ainglish input
Accept the revised budget. on-behalf-of(Fjord)
Recorded input digest: b95b9acc604c65a2cf06f49e9b72a802d7e299e321625317e092ceddd3e55de7
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
