Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?multiply-the-quantity — write "3 times as many as A", never "3 times more than A": the first is one number, the second is two2026-09-10 10:02 UTCmultiply-the-quantity — write "3 times as many as A", never "3 times more than A": the first is one number, the second is two2026-09-11 15:16 UTC
What was measured?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?7 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 3 to 7Counts in current evidence decisions7.5 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 3.75 to 7.5Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehensionEnglish comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
8 prospective authored pairs crossing multiplier (3x, 5x, 10x, 2x) and form (as-many vs more-than)
Second result
8 prospective authored pairs crossing multiplier (3x, 5x, 10x, 2x) and form (as-many vs more-than)
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
pair
Second result
pair
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "maximum tokenizer mean"
}
Second result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "maximum tokenizer mean"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordtoken cost · 7 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-10 10:02 UTC

multiply-the-quantity — write "3 times as many as A", never "3 times more than A": the first is one number, the second is two

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
7 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 3 to 7.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 7 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
The new system processed three times as many requests as the old one.
Ainglish input
The new system processed three-times-as-many(requests, ref=the old one).

Input 2

English input
The new system processed three times more requests than the old one.
Ainglish input
The new system processed three-times-more-than(requests, ref=the old one).

Input 3

English input
We need to scale the capacity to five times as many users as last quarter.
Ainglish input
We need to scale the capacity to five-times-as-many(users, ref=last quarter).

Input 4

English input
We need to scale the capacity to five times more users than last quarter.
Ainglish input
We need to scale the capacity to five-times-more-than(users, ref=last quarter).

Input 5

English input
The optimized query returns ten times as many rows as the original.
Ainglish input
The optimized query returns ten-times-as-many(rows, ref=the original).

Input 6

English input
The optimized query returns ten times more rows than the original.
Ainglish input
The optimized query returns ten-times-more-than(rows, ref=the original).

Recorded input digest: 2663038ebf231713e81a31740ebb937a87ed5419661db99f442d1bd62f272420

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish multiply marker versus full English paraphrase
Tested population
8 prospective authored pairs crossing multiplier (3x, 5x, 10x, 2x) and form (as-many vs more-than)
Unit tested
pair
How results combine
maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 3
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 3.25
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 7
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 409f00ac-1129-4b52-b188-46cc56d71c86
Content 9680997fa95bd8df13d1ad7919f06a163579e10e004e91d8bb44309464be5515

Second result: full recordtoken cost · 7.5 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-11 15:16 UTC

multiply-the-quantity — write "3 times as many as A", never "3 times more than A": the first is one number, the second is two

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
7.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 3.75 to 7.5.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 7.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original. This replication reports 7.5 tokens; the named original reported 7.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 8 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 8 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity9680997fa95bd8df13d1ad7919f06a163579e10e004e91d8bb44309464be5515
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · sat-20260911-multiply-three-as-many

English input
The coastal survey logged three times as many nesting sites as the inland survey.
Ainglish input
The coastal survey logged three-times-as-many(nesting sites, ref=the inland survey).

Input 2 · sat-20260911-multiply-three-more-than

English input
The coastal survey logged three times more nesting sites than the inland survey.
Ainglish input
The coastal survey logged three-times-more-than(nesting sites, ref=the inland survey).

Input 3 · sat-20260911-multiply-five-as-many

English input
The revised gateway admitted five times as many connections as the retired gateway.
Ainglish input
The revised gateway admitted five-times-as-many(connections, ref=the retired gateway).

Input 4 · sat-20260911-multiply-five-more-than

English input
The revised gateway admitted five times more connections than the retired gateway.
Ainglish input
The revised gateway admitted five-times-more-than(connections, ref=the retired gateway).

Input 5 · sat-20260911-multiply-ten-as-many

English input
The compact archive retained ten times as many snapshots as the legacy archive.
Ainglish input
The compact archive retained ten-times-as-many(snapshots, ref=the legacy archive).

Input 6 · sat-20260911-multiply-ten-more-than

English input
The compact archive retained ten times more snapshots than the legacy archive.
Ainglish input
The compact archive retained ten-times-more-than(snapshots, ref=the legacy archive).

Recorded input digest: 8ee31b860a0d4c56489c35df7c455817488c24d9386fe97653c4d24d7f9c05c4

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish multiply marker versus full English paraphrase
Tested population
8 prospective authored pairs crossing multiplier (3x, 5x, 10x, 2x) and form (as-many vs more-than)
Unit tested
pair
How results combine
maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 3.75
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 3.75
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 7.5
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 62a612b3-37d7-4f17-86bb-42e5cc3b3876
Content b372210476025b8ec7fdd4435ade88494f8562947c51e55e5da9aebd4ae67808

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.