First result · 2026-08-15 23:45 UTC
percentage points, not bare percent — a change to a percentage is stated in points, endpoints attached when known
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- comprehension accuracy ·
comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel? - Reported result
- 0 percentage points
Reported interval: 0 to 0.The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Reader exposure
- Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
- Named instruments
Excelsior-local-Qwen3.8-27B-Q4_K_M@q4_k_mReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
4274686df67d83ec8fb12f9468142140564436fb898e65941a8e8ef6c468b559How often did each version lead to the right answer?
- English comparison
- 100.00%
100.00% - Ainglish version
- 100.00%
100.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 0 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.
Real cases: 28 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 28 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 8 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · additive-01
- English input
- Trial conversion rose 5%, from 10% to 15%.
- Ainglish input
- Trial conversion rose 5 percentage points, from 10% to 15%.
- Question
- Which kind of change does the complete report describe?
- Recorded answer options
additive percentage-point change·relative percent change·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 2 · additive-02
- English input
- Cache hit rate rose 4%, from 42% to 46%.
- Ainglish input
- Cache hit rate rose 4 percentage points, from 42% to 46%.
- Question
- Which kind of change does the complete report describe?
- Recorded answer options
additive percentage-point change·relative percent change·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 3 · additive-03
- English input
- Review acceptance fell 7%, from 68% to 61%.
- Ainglish input
- Review acceptance fell 7 percentage points, from 68% to 61%.
- Question
- Which kind of change does the complete report describe?
- Recorded answer options
additive percentage-point change·relative percent change·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · additive-04
- English input
- Task completion rose 6%, from 25% to 31%.
- Ainglish input
- Task completion rose 6 percentage points, from 25% to 31%.
- Question
- Which kind of change does the complete report describe?
- Recorded answer options
additive percentage-point change·relative percent change·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · additive-05
- English input
- Retry frequency fell 3%, from 54% to 51%.
- Ainglish input
- Retry frequency fell 3 percentage points, from 54% to 51%.
- Question
- Which kind of change does the complete report describe?
- Recorded answer options
additive percentage-point change·relative percent change·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · additive-06
- English input
- Coverage rose 8%, from 12% to 20%.
- Ainglish input
- Coverage rose 8 percentage points, from 12% to 20%.
- Question
- Which kind of change does the complete report describe?
- Recorded answer options
additive percentage-point change·relative percent change·cannot tell- Submitted answer key
- additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: 170cb0a594d631036bcead8f66f505661c812472710a97d77ab15345336c77be
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
{
"english": 1,
"ainglish": 1,
"chance": 0.333299999999999985167420391007908619940280914306640625
}
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "Excelsior-local-Qwen3.8-27B-Q4_K_M",
"value": 0,
"precision": "q4_k_m"
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 425c7ca0-9b6d-4917-b4c9-27abc163065d
Content f49e6269ea79df4f41bc1343619d0068e8537f6ceebad4fbfa9ea7bf34e4b7f8