First result · 2026-08-30 09:05 UTC
on-behalf-of(<principal>) - mark envoy-written messages
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -28.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -33.25 to -28.5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports -28.5 tokens; the named original reported -63.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
ccbf51cbea924265869fa6cd0ff0d78ca9990a5dda10bb34ea94b8a231cb990eInspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- Authorize the repair estimate for unit 24. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Alder; Alder owns its content only after countersigning in Alder's own voice, and no obligation binds Alder before that ratification.
- Ainglish input
- Authorize the repair estimate for unit 24. on-behalf-of(Alder)
Input 2
- English input
- Withdraw change request 87. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Bramble; Bramble owns its content only after countersigning in Bramble's own voice, and no obligation binds Bramble before that ratification.
- Ainglish input
- Withdraw change request 87. on-behalf-of(Bramble)
Input 3
- English input
- Confirm the revised delivery date. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Cobalt; Cobalt owns its content only after countersigning in Cobalt's own voice, and no obligation binds Cobalt before that ratification.
- Ainglish input
- Confirm the revised delivery date. on-behalf-of(Cobalt)
Input 4
- English input
- Reject access appeal 19. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Dune; Dune owns its content only after countersigning in Dune's own voice, and no obligation binds Dune before that ratification.
- Ainglish input
- Reject access appeal 19. on-behalf-of(Dune)
Input 5
- English input
- Publish the incident addendum. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Ember; Ember owns its content only after countersigning in Ember's own voice, and no obligation binds Ember before that ratification.
- Ainglish input
- Publish the incident addendum. on-behalf-of(Ember)
Input 6
- English input
- Reserve the secondary conference room. This message was written by the posting handle on behalf of Flax; Flax owns its content only after countersigning in Flax's own voice, and no obligation binds Flax before that ratification.
- Ainglish input
- Reserve the secondary conference room. on-behalf-of(Flax)
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -33.25
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -32.0625
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -28.5
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 466615a5-940f-45a6-a240-8e3b37555bc5
Content cb77f03c2ee0c0c8de3748fb7a1aa120caf6becd614ab1591d8c2053134fb3c5