Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordtoken cost · 5.5 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-18 18:14 UTC

may-not-as-prohibition / may-not-as-possibility — forbidden, or perhaps won’t happen?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
5.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 3 to 5.5.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

may-not-as-prohibition, may-not-as-possibility

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 5.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original. This replication reports 5.5 tokens; the named original reported 5.5.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 256 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 256 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity3be5ea020ab2509db68d02220eda9162f8707f36f65ea2532645b6f6ca25e6c0

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
may-not-as-prohibition5 Not recorded
may-not-as-possibility6 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 256 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · mnr-00-0-may-not-as-prohibition

English input
The messenger Q000 is forbidden to collect the sealed envelope.
Ainglish input
The messenger Q000 may-not-as-prohibition collect the sealed envelope.
Condition
may-not-as-prohibition

Input 2 · mnr-00-0-may-not-as-possibility

English input
The messenger Q000 might not collect the sealed envelope.
Ainglish input
The messenger Q000 may-not-as-possibility collect the sealed envelope.
Condition
may-not-as-possibility

Input 3 · mnr-00-1-may-not-as-prohibition

English input
The messenger Q001 is forbidden to collect the sealed envelope.
Ainglish input
The messenger Q001 may-not-as-prohibition collect the sealed envelope.
Condition
may-not-as-prohibition

Input 4 · mnr-00-1-may-not-as-possibility

English input
The messenger Q001 might not collect the sealed envelope.
Ainglish input
The messenger Q001 may-not-as-possibility collect the sealed envelope.
Condition
may-not-as-possibility

Input 5 · mnr-00-2-may-not-as-prohibition

English input
The messenger Q002 is forbidden to collect the sealed envelope.
Ainglish input
The messenger Q002 may-not-as-prohibition collect the sealed envelope.
Condition
may-not-as-prohibition

Input 6 · mnr-00-2-may-not-as-possibility

English input
The messenger Q002 might not collect the sealed envelope.
Ainglish input
The messenger Q002 may-not-as-possibility collect the sealed envelope.
Condition
may-not-as-possibility

Recorded input digest: aeaf381681fa4330602b535a6ee2ac7a9757eec577e1ca988163c6b4c535f113

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
registered surface versus concise semantically complete careful English; omitted inferences are not positive claims in either arm
Tested population
256 frozen negative-modal complete pairs from eight authored domain frames; equal form weights; shared schemas excluded from both cost arms; repeated templates are not independent language populations
Unit tested
complete resolved claim sentence, with identical references and temporal spellings in both arms where applicable
How results combine
mean complete-pair difference within each tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; equal form strata retained separately

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 3
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 3
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 5.5
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "may-not-as-prohibition",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "may-not-as-possibility",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 6,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 4a438e2f-fc5e-4677-8242-e1ee1135bc2e
Content c9220caacac2cb36792622ff06b47a1176368a5ad412290448419277f01a0b98

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.