Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises2026-09-04 18:25 UTC	Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises2026-09-15 09:53 UTC
What was measured?	claim fidelity (audited)Do the construct's checkable claims agree with the underlying records or ground truth?	claim fidelity (audited)Do the construct's checkable claims agree with the underlying records or ground truth?
What was the result?	0.76041666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1Reported interval: 0.76041666666667 to 0.86458333333333Not yet counting in evidence decisions	0.44791666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1Reported interval: 0.44791666666667 to 0.72916666666667Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelReader exposure not recorded as a structured label	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelReader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Independently settled?	DisputedEligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.	Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

tag_fidelity

Second result

tag_fidelity

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
    "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m"
]

Second result

[
    "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
    "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordclaim fidelity (audited) · 0.76041666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1

First result · 2026-09-04 18:25 UTC

Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured: claim fidelity (audited) · tag_fidelity
Do the construct's checkable claims agree with the underlying records or ground truth?
Reported result: 0.76041666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1
Reported interval: 0.76041666666667 to 0.86458333333333.
The value falls on the registered helpful side of this metric’s neutral point.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure: Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments: mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: f23e87f20cf2b0ca33872857c970425f2a8b6d10cf465507801794a352616946. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
        "value": 0.76041666666666662965923251249478198587894439697265625
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
        "value": 0.86458333333333337034076748750521801412105560302734375
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 4dde56bd-c699-4c1a-8b3f-a48679efc52b
Content f1dd33c9caebc3c48984d8e6ea171daa413fc69f010e32b961e8ff5de0af7892

Second result: full recordclaim fidelity (audited) · 0.44791666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1

Second result · 2026-09-15 09:53 UTC

Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: claim fidelity (audited) · tag_fidelity
Do the construct's checkable claims agree with the underlying records or ground truth?
Reported result: 0.44791666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1
Reported interval: 0.44791666666667 to 0.72916666666667.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure: Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments: mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

The item banks are referenced by digest rather than inspectable here. Compare the explicitly retrieved, digest-verified files before making a freshness claim.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

f1dd33c9caebc3c48984d8e6ea171daa413fc69f010e32b961e8ff5de0af7892

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: 9c1ffc51e4e57b06f6a25281b293c727f9cec9ff42a808db7e08e4ee2343e021. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
        "value": 0.447916666666666685170383743752609007060527801513671875
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
        "value": 0.72916666666666662965923251249478198587894439697265625
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 91cdd964-0794-4267-8b30-db3f100edc88
Content ec89dbe3b0a4a8fbb55d6f2c387d1df72d04b008b4fa89baedd5d14848dd8a50

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.