Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.
This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.
Find experiments by proposal
What differs in the declared methods?
These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
"complete-careful-english-explicit-verb-v1"
]
Second result
[
"complete-careful-english-explicit-verb-v1"
]
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
16 prospective authored formal-act reports: 8 permissions and 8 penalties across 16 distinct authorities and domains (finance, research ethics, municipal, aviation, data protection, elections, ports, standards, sport, competition, medicine, environment, schools, international security); identical facts in both arms; not random natural prose
Second result
16 prospective authored formal-act reports: 8 permissions and 8 penalties across 16 distinct authorities and domains (finance, research ethics, municipal, aviation, data protection, elections, ports, standards, sport, competition, medicine, environment, schools, international security); identical facts in both arms; not random natural prose
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
one complete report of a formal act by a named authority, including the authority, the target, the polarity and the specifics of the act
Second result
one complete report of a formal act by a named authority, including the authority, the target, the polarity and the specifics of the act
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "Equal item mean over all 16 pairs within each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable) across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Bounds are tokenizer member span, not a population confidence interval."
}
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "Equal item mean over all 16 pairs within each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable) across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Bounds are tokenizer member span, not a population confidence interval."
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
5.25 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 3.125 to 5.25.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reported token direction. More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Current declared cost bound: at most 4 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is outside that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.
A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Counts cover readable inputs stored inline here. An external artifact may contain additional study items or controls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
The financial regulator formally permitted bank 7 to acquire branch 2.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(financial-regulator): bank-7 may acquire branch-2.
Condition
allow
Input 2
English input
The ethics committee formally approved the second phase of the study.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(ethics-committee): the second phase of the study may proceed.
Condition
allow
Input 3
English input
The city council formally permitted the market to open on Sundays.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(city-council): the market may open on Sundays.
Condition
allow
Input 4
English input
The aviation authority formally approved the airline's new route to Oslo.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(aviation-authority): the airline may fly the new route to Oslo.
Condition
allow
Input 5
English input
The data-protection authority formally permitted the hospital to share the anonymised dataset.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(data-protection-authority): the hospital may share the anonymised dataset.
Condition
allow
Input 6
English input
The election commission formally approved the party's candidate list.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(election-commission): the party's candidate list may stand.
Condition
allow
Recorded input digest: 4dee3ee639b35d0960489f7bdb4a557e67eb9ab43ac60a182ce67141ef89ce15
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Registered sanction-allow / sanction-penalize form minus complete careful English stating the same authority, target, polarity and specifics with the explicit competitor verbs (formally permitted / approved; formally imposed a penalty, fine, restriction or embargo) — the comparator the proposal's own example pairs use
Tested population
16 prospective authored formal-act reports: 8 permissions and 8 penalties across 16 distinct authorities and domains (finance, research ethics, municipal, aviation, data protection, elections, ports, standards, sport, competition, medicine, environment, schools, international security); identical facts in both arms; not random natural prose
Unit tested
one complete report of a formal act by a named authority, including the authority, the target, the polarity and the specifics of the act
How results combine
Equal item mean over all 16 pairs within each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable) across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Bounds are tokenizer member span, not a population confidence interval.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
5.125 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 2.8125 to 5.125.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reported token direction. More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
Current declared cost bound: at most 4 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is outside that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.
A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Counts cover readable inputs stored inline here. An external artifact may contain additional study items or controls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
The banking commission formally permitted the lender to open office 9.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(banking-commission): the lender may open office-9.
Condition
allow
Input 2
English input
The research board formally permitted the vaccine trial to recruit adults.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(research-board): the vaccine trial may recruit adults.
Condition
allow
Input 3
English input
The borough council formally permitted the fair to operate on Fridays.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(borough-council): the fair may operate on Fridays.
Condition
allow
Input 4
English input
The flight regulator formally permitted the carrier to serve Riga.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(flight-regulator): the carrier may serve Riga.
Condition
allow
Input 5
English input
The privacy commission formally permitted the clinic to release anonymised images.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(privacy-commission): the clinic may release anonymised images.
Condition
allow
Input 6
English input
The ballot authority formally permitted the coalition to register its slate.
Ainglish input
sanction-allow(ballot-authority): the coalition may register its slate.
Condition
allow
Recorded input digest: 1c8fa22b1a9af62b58b7e492008a6a519af05f950759f7f72ee2a9cb6f4eb03a
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Registered sanction-allow / sanction-penalize form minus complete careful English stating the same authority, target, polarity and specifics with the explicit competitor verbs (formally permitted / approved; formally imposed a penalty, fine, restriction or embargo) — the comparator the proposal's own example pairs use
Tested population
16 prospective authored formal-act reports: 8 permissions and 8 penalties across 16 distinct authorities and domains (finance, research ethics, municipal, aviation, data protection, elections, ports, standards, sport, competition, medicine, environment, schools, international security); identical facts in both arms; not random natural prose
Unit tested
one complete report of a formal act by a named authority, including the authority, the target, the polarity and the specifics of the act
How results combine
Equal item mean over all 16 pairs within each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable) across cl100k_base, o200k_base and p50k_base. Bounds are tokenizer member span, not a population confidence interval.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
