Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	Blank is not a value — type missing data as unknown, none, redacted, or inapplicable2026-09-02 16:11 UTC	Blank is not a value — type missing data as unknown, none, redacted, or inapplicable2026-09-03 08:11 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	2.8 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 2.8 to 2.8Not yet counting in evidence decisions	3.875 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 1.375 to 3.875Not yet counting in evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	DisputedEligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.	Incommensurable pending repairA comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Only recorded on one side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

8 frozen disjoint value-X pairs, Spark replication

Unit tested · Only recorded on one side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

complete message

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Only recorded on one side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean, then maximum tokenizer mean"
}

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordtoken cost · 2.8 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-02 16:11 UTC

Blank is not a value — type missing data as unknown, none, redacted, or inapplicable

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: 2.8 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 2.8 to 2.8.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 2.8 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disputed.

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 10 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: The middle name is blank.
Ainglish input: middle-name: value-unknown.

Input 2

English input: The middle name is not applicable.
Ainglish input: middle-name: value-inapplicable.

Input 3

English input: The engine serial was redacted.
Ainglish input: engine-serial: value-redacted(privacy).

Input 4

English input: No middle name was provided.
Ainglish input: middle-name: value-none.

Input 5

English input: The field is empty.
Ainglish input: field-x: value-unknown.

Input 6

English input: This property does not apply to bicycles.
Ainglish input: engine-type: value-inapplicable.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 0.8000000000000000444089209850062616169452667236328125
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 0.90000000000000002220446049250313080847263336181640625
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 2.79999999999999982236431605997495353221893310546875
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 5419fe3a-c1ae-4fb2-b07f-e337c0db014a
Content 6a9d6e20bd982e7f647e018a92fc842570e30c3d15578d625eed1f6bee9948eb

Second result: full recordtoken cost · 3.875 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-03 08:11 UTC

Blank is not a value — type missing data as unknown, none, redacted, or inapplicable

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: 3.875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 1.375 to 3.875.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Incommensurable pending repair
A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 3.875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Incommensurable pending repair. This replication reports 3.875 tokens; the named original reported 2.8.

A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

6a9d6e20bd982e7f647e018a92fc842570e30c3d15578d625eed1f6bee9948eb

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: No nickname is on file.
Ainglish input: nickname: value-unknown.

Input 2

English input: Passports do not apply here.
Ainglish input: passport-number: value-inapplicable.

Input 3

English input: No contact was listed.
Ainglish input: emergency-contact: value-none.

Input 4

English input: The blood type is unrecorded.
Ainglish input: blood-type: value-unknown.

Input 5

English input: The size was withheld.
Ainglish input: shoe-size: value-redacted(privacy).

Input 6

English input: No mileage was entered.
Ainglish input: car-mileage: value-none.

Recorded input digest: 57f30c55635b07afa0298cbad76610d2bcdb36467a7c9977b50e3359228008da

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: Ainglish value-X tag versus short English gloss
Tested population: 8 frozen disjoint value-X pairs, Spark replication
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean, then maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 1.375
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 1.375
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 3.875
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt b3a8fb6c-141a-4925-93b6-030f627e3dcc
Content f88a2bfb9d9cd4cbb2707bb4ddf5719e1ff7d6e0a1e86855b5645d2ed75f4828

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.