Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Showing experiments for resolved-by-assignment / resolved-by-default — was this value supplied, or filled in?. Show recent experiments from all proposals

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results for this proposal, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Browse all evidence for this proposal

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordtoken cost · -0.0625 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-10-17 15:19 UTC

resolved-by-assignment / resolved-by-default — was this value supplied, or filled in?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-0.0625 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -3.5625 to -0.0625.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

assignment, default

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disagrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -0.0625 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Disagrees with the named original. This replication reports -0.0625 tokens; the named original reported -0.125.

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 16 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 16 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity5153b9584cf58c89a1d99d0be2d3ea168b4b1394dfc7b0b3777ae654df051ecb

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
assignment2.5 Not recorded
default-2.625 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
payments-v21.retry_limit uses 4 because the explicit assignment PAYMENTS_RETRY_LIMIT in env-stage-3 supplied that value.
Ainglish input
payments-v21.retry_limit resolved-by-assignment(4, source=PAYMENTS_RETRY_LIMIT in env-stage-3)
Condition
assignment

Input 2

English input
auth-svc.session_ttl_min uses 45 because the explicit assignment session_ttl_min in release-r210 supplied that value.
Ainglish input
auth-svc.session_ttl_min resolved-by-assignment(45, source=session_ttl_min in release-r210)
Condition
assignment

Input 3

English input
mailer.max_batch uses 200 because the explicit assignment max_batch in mailer.toml supplied that value.
Ainglish input
mailer.max_batch resolved-by-assignment(200, source=max_batch in mailer.toml)
Condition
assignment

Input 4

English input
notif-v7.flag.digest_mode uses on because the explicit assignment digest_mode in flag-set fs-19 supplied that value.
Ainglish input
notif-v7.flag.digest_mode resolved-by-assignment(on, source=digest_mode in flag-set fs-19)
Condition
assignment

Input 5

English input
metrics-agent.scrape_interval_s uses 20 because the explicit assignment scrape_interval in collector-profile-c2 supplied that value.
Ainglish input
metrics-agent.scrape_interval_s resolved-by-assignment(20, source=scrape_interval in collector-profile-c2)
Condition
assignment

Input 6

English input
orders-queue.prefetch uses 32 because the explicit assignment prefetch in broker-override ob-5 supplied that value.
Ainglish input
orders-queue.prefetch resolved-by-assignment(32, source=prefetch in broker-override ob-5)
Condition
assignment

Recorded input digest: cebbe66d313890323450344e04e638138ab192308c998498a6bdcae4ac2c48a9

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
marked form minus the proposal's declared honest English disclosure, with opaque reference strings preserved verbatim on both sides
Tested population
sixteen complete statements, eight per form (assignment / default), over deployment configuration, environment variables, service baselines, feature flags, telemetry and queue settings; power-of-two sample
Unit tested
one complete configuration-resolution statement: either the marked form verbatim from the proposal's declared form, or the proposal's declared honest English disclosure for the same (K, V, A/R) substitution
How results combine
maximum tokenizer mean across cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base (least-favourable tokenizer)

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -3.5625
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -3.5625
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -0.0625
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "assignment",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 2.5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "default",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -2.625,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 5718b4b4-5ed9-4c0f-993c-51c43d6f4c0d
Content edc6ade4d61f7caae4c9ef46580a92df6c32d6c08ae2f99fe994e5b2c6dcb1fd

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.