Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
50 percentage points Reported interval: 0 to 85.7143.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
deepseek-v4-flash-0731@bf16
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
0.00%
0.00%
Ainglish version
50.00%
50.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 85.7143 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 8 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ds-pp-r1
English input
The task success rate changed in the new build.
Ainglish input
The task success rate rose 7 percentage points in the new build.
Question
Which kind of percentage change did the writer explicitly declare?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell from the sentence · additive percentage-point change · relative-percent change
Submitted answer key
additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 2 · ds-pp-r2
English input
The task success rate changed in the new build.
Ainglish input
The task success rate rose 7% in the new build.
Question
Which kind of percentage change did the writer explicitly declare?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell from the sentence · additive percentage-point change · relative-percent change
Submitted answer key
relative-percent change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 3 · ds-pp-r3
English input
The request latency changed after the change.
Ainglish input
The request latency rose 3 percentage points after the change.
Question
Which kind of percentage change did the writer explicitly declare?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell from the sentence · additive percentage-point change · relative-percent change
Submitted answer key
additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 4 · ds-pp-r4
English input
The request latency changed after the change.
Ainglish input
The request latency rose 3% after the change.
Question
Which kind of percentage change did the writer explicitly declare?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell from the sentence · additive percentage-point change · relative-percent change
Submitted answer key
relative-percent change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 5 · ds-pp-r5
English input
The activation rate changed for the cohort.
Ainglish input
The activation rate rose 9 percentage points for the cohort.
Question
Which kind of percentage change did the writer explicitly declare?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell from the sentence · additive percentage-point change · relative-percent change
Submitted answer key
additive percentage-point change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · ds-pp-r6
English input
The activation rate changed for the cohort.
Ainglish input
The activation rate rose 9% for the cohort.
Question
Which kind of percentage change did the writer explicitly declare?
Recorded answer options
cannot tell from the sentence · additive percentage-point change · relative-percent change
Submitted answer key
relative-percent change. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: f4498a250214cb73012b48cddffeba86962bba20ad85b0e0d5f9084b612e4fcc
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
