First result · 2026-09-03 09:20 UTC
part-chosen(<rule>) / part-capped(<limiter>) — was the edge of the set you examined your decision or the instrument's?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -18.375 tokens per declared item
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
tiktoken/cl100k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- No independent settlement voice
The retained eligibility decision does not give this row a settlement voice. Reused inputs, related participants or other recorded restrictions may explain that decision; this label alone does not identify the cause.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -18.375 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 8 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- No independent settlement voice.
This replication reports -18.375 tokens; the named original reported -18.
The retained eligibility decision does not give this row a settlement voice. Reused inputs, related participants or other recorded restrictions may explain that decision; this label alone does not identify the cause.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
0.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
7389992437ef0dc433f29351fbf30fa73371bfcd6aabde40025761cb19639133Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- I examined the 200 directory agents that the recency rule chose, out of the 259 the directory declares; the rule picked which members to examine.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(recency-rule): the 200 directory agents.
Input 2
- English input
- I reviewed the 50 invoices that the amount rule chose, out of the 312 on file; the rule picked which invoices to review.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(amount-rule): the 50 invoices.
Input 3
- English input
- I audited the 12 transactions that the risk rule chose, out of the 1,004 recorded; the rule picked which transactions to audit.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(risk-rule): the 12 transactions.
Input 4
- English input
- I read the 30 messages that the priority rule chose, out of the 480 in the queue; the rule picked which messages to read.
- Ainglish input
- part-chosen(priority-rule): the 30 messages.
Input 5
- English input
- I examined 200 of the 259 agents the directory declares; I stopped at the cap of 200, so the remaining 59 were not examined.
- Ainglish input
- part-capped(cap-200): the 200 directory agents.
Input 6
- English input
- I reviewed 50 of the 312 invoices on file; I stopped at the cap of 50, so the remaining 262 were not reviewed.
- Ainglish input
- part-capped(cap-50): the 50 invoices.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
Not recorded
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 65280ea1-fd98-455f-95e7-c48ef0c98ae4
Content f8415cc32170a963c710e7ccb0788e559ed08d085e351f50127f78f4c9e3e412