Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed — state whether a task may be handed to another principal2026-09-18 13:55 UTCno-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed — state whether a task may be handed to another principal2026-09-18 17:03 UTC
What was measured?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?-36 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -37.5 to -36Counts in current evidence decisions-36 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -37.5 to -36Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehensionEnglish comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
24 frozen complete assignments: both delegation states crossed over 12 new operational contexts in 12 domains
Second result
24 frozen complete assignments: both delegation states crossed over 12 new operational contexts in 12 domains
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
one complete assignment with its delegation-depth condition
Second result
one complete assignment with its delegation-depth condition
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain equal-weight literal-form strata"
}
Second result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain equal-weight literal-form strata"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    {
        "id": "no-delegation",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "one-hop-delegation-allowed",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
Second result
[
    {
        "id": "no-delegation",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "one-hop-delegation-allowed",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
First result: full recordtoken cost · -36 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-18 13:55 UTC

no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed — state whether a task may be handed to another principal

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-36 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -37.5 to -36.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

no-delegation, one-hop-delegation-allowed

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
no-delegation-36 Not recorded
one-hop-delegation-allowed-36 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · soil-custody-direct

English input
The responsible principal is required to certify the soil-sample chain of custody for lot Amber. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: certify the soil-sample chain of custody for lot Amber, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 2 · soil-custody-one-hop

English input
The responsible principal is required to certify the soil-sample chain of custody for lot Amber. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: certify the soil-sample chain of custody for lot Amber, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Input 3 · pump-logs-direct

English input
The responsible principal is required to reconcile the dialysis-pump maintenance logs for ward Birch. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: reconcile the dialysis-pump maintenance logs for ward Birch, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 4 · pump-logs-one-hop

English input
The responsible principal is required to reconcile the dialysis-pump maintenance logs for ward Birch. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: reconcile the dialysis-pump maintenance logs for ward Birch, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Input 5 · refund-trace-direct

English input
The responsible principal is required to trace refund anomaly R-418 through the signed settlement records. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: trace refund anomaly R-418 through the signed settlement records, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 6 · refund-trace-one-hop

English input
The responsible principal is required to trace refund anomaly R-418 through the signed settlement records. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: trace refund anomaly R-418 through the signed settlement records, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Recorded input digest: b76115073853922ec75fa68d375f700b39be8d26d3c701a5c4a59fc6d1b4fb60

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed versus complete careful English preserving responsibility, redelegation and authority limits
Tested population
24 frozen complete assignments: both delegation states crossed over 12 new operational contexts in 12 domains
Unit tested
one complete assignment with its delegation-depth condition
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain equal-weight literal-form strata

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -37.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -36.5
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -36
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "no-delegation",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -36,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "one-hop-delegation-allowed",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -36,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 6674a9e4-e88a-492e-9d6a-cddb3961cf1e
Content 6f4a0934c94fd451251872df3de00c18c9481caa2630c8efb406b71ef41de9ab

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -36 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-18 17:03 UTC

no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed — state whether a task may be handed to another principal

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-36 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -37.5 to -36.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

no-delegation, one-hop-delegation-allowed

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -36 tokens; the named original reported -36.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 24 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 24 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity6f4a0934c94fd451251872df3de00c18c9481caa2630c8efb406b71ef41de9ab

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
no-delegation-36 Not recorded
one-hop-delegation-allowed-36 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · blank-results-no-delegation

English input
The responsible principal is required to compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 2 · blank-results-one-hop-delegation-allowed

English input
The responsible principal is required to compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: compare the water-blank results with calibration register Quartz, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Input 3 · sterilizer-clock-no-delegation

English input
The responsible principal is required to check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 4 · sterilizer-clock-one-hop-delegation-allowed

English input
The responsible principal is required to check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: check the sterilizer clock against reference timer M-63, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Input 5 · duplicate-payout-no-delegation

English input
The responsible principal is required to investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan. The responsible principal must perform every completion-bearing part without assigning one to another principal; controlled deterministic tools and advice remain allowed when no other principal is made responsible for part of the work.
Ainglish input
req: investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan, no-delegation.
Condition
no-delegation

Input 6 · duplicate-payout-one-hop-delegation-allowed

English input
The responsible principal is required to investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan. The responsible principal may, but need not, assign work to any number of immediate delegates; those delegates may not delegate further, the original principal remains accountable for integration and completion, and no underlying authority is expanded.
Ainglish input
req: investigate the duplicate payout entry in settlement batch Rowan, one-hop-delegation-allowed.
Condition
one-hop-delegation-allowed

Recorded input digest: aaccd1226b14a5859c7f080b1fd932735743c6954715fdbc0924b95faef132b6

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
no-delegation / one-hop-delegation-allowed versus complete careful English preserving responsibility, redelegation and authority limits
Tested population
24 frozen complete assignments: both delegation states crossed over 12 new operational contexts in 12 domains
Unit tested
one complete assignment with its delegation-depth condition
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain equal-weight literal-form strata

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -37.5
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -36.5
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -36
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "no-delegation",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -36,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "one-hop-delegation-allowed",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -36,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 30a46e2f-d802-44a1-b8e8-d66c6a342222
Content 2a71c0f89c723148d88408409c2bdaf8c5db07570ff68354376befd315d96fc1

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.