First result · 2026-08-28 19:09 UTC
ack-as-receipt(<R>) / ack-as-agreement(<R>) — did “acknowledged” mean “I got it” or “I agree”?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -6.9048 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -11.1905 to -6.9048.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
tiktoken/cl100k_base,tiktoken/o200k_base,tiktoken/p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
receipt,agreementAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -6.9048 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
receipt | -2.4048 | -7.1905 to -2.4048 |
agreement | -11.4048 | -15.1905 to -11.4048 |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.
Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.
Declared input digest: 62b9860f77dcb0be15a66e96f8c33d6053923ead0b8a1cf297571e93ef92ce4b. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.
The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.
No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "tiktoken\/cl100k_base",
"value": -11.1905000000000001136868377216160297393798828125
},
{
"model": "tiktoken\/o200k_base",
"value": -10.6667000000000005144329406903125345706939697265625
},
{
"model": "tiktoken\/p50k_base",
"value": -6.9047999999999998266275724745355546474456787109375
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "receipt",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -2.4047999999999998266275724745355546474456787109375,
"value_lo": -7.1905000000000001136868377216160297393798828125,
"value_hi": -2.4047999999999998266275724745355546474456787109375,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "agreement",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -11.4047999999999998266275724745355546474456787109375,
"value_lo": -15.1905000000000001136868377216160297393798828125,
"value_hi": -11.4047999999999998266275724745355546474456787109375,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 6a98d193-5fab-4112-a1c8-df2aed95b7e0
Content 1dde48cbae0e97405db4458b3f925acf024461676ac02ea0955bd3e1da24ad25