Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

First result · 2026-08-30 23:52 UTC

different-from(ref, by=key) / different-across(group, by=key) — what is a ‘different’ choice different from?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0.22 percentage points
Reported interval: -9.9377 to 10.352.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9@q4_k_m, olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disputed

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
29.27%
29.27%
Ainglish version
29.49%
29.49%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported interval (method not identified here): -9.9377 to 10.352 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.

Real cases: 160 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

No readable non-control input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used no inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. The website has not fetched or verified it. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

Recorded input digest: 62dd68f3e4fba1b3d6b274c41566625a51225e435cf30f77109f55bc4e781797

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.292700000000000015720758028692216612398624420166015625,
    "ainglish": 0.294899999999999995470290059529361315071582794189453125,
    "chance": 0.25
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "falcon3-10b-qualification-v7-c8647169c2b9",
        "value": -9.410000000000000142108547152020037174224853515625,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    },
    {
        "model": "olmo2-13b-qualification-v7-cd836509a1a0",
        "value": 9.8499999999999996447286321199499070644378662109375,
        "precision": "q4_k_m"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 79277594-e25e-4e56-9a4e-79953292483c
Content 15bb5a3cc90f945b71752bdae3d93d2702a4cd67af6ea2859948e65d044f33f4

Second result · 2026-09-06 11:00 UTC

different-from(ref, by=key) / different-across(group, by=key) — what is a ‘different’ choice different from?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-16.67 percentage points
Reported interval: -50 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

The proposal complete careful English mapping.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
spark-zen-13-minimal

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disagrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Declared target content identity15bb5a3cc90f945b71752bdae3d93d2702a4cd67af6ea2859948e65d044f33f4

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
83.33%
83.33%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -50 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 12 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Showing the first 3 of 12 readable, inline non-control items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items omitted.

Input 5 · real-f1

English input
Every reviewer tested a model whose model ID differs from production's model ID; reviewers may repeat a candidate. Production runs titan-2; Ann and Ben both tested atlas-7, Cal tested boreal-3.
Ainglish input
Production runs the titan-2 model. Each reviewer tested a model, different-from(production, by=model-id): Ann and Ben tested atlas-7, Cal tested boreal-3.
Question
May two reviewers have tested the same model?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 6 · real-f2

English input
Every mirror synced a file whose checksum differs from the golden file's checksum; mirrors may repeat a file. Golden checksum is 9f31; eu-west and eu-east both synced 77ac, us-west synced b204.
Ainglish input
The golden file checksum is 9f31. Each mirror synced a file, different-from(golden, by=checksum): eu-west and eu-east synced 77ac, us-west synced b204.
Question
May two mirrors have synced the same file?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 7 · real-f3

English input
Every site elected a chair whose owner differs from the incumbent's owner; sites may repeat a chair. The incumbent owner is Hale; North and South both elected Okafor, East elected Reyes.
Ainglish input
The incumbent owner is Hale. Each site elected a chair, different-from(incumbent, by=owner): North and South elected Okafor, East elected Reyes.
Question
May two sites have elected the same chair?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Recorded input digest: 78b172ac195af379334ce2738421a8f3183778527b47f70c6ea4039f35649918

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 0.83330000000000004067857162226573564112186431884765625,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "spark-zen-13-minimal",
        "value": -16.6700000000000017053025658242404460906982421875
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt bebefad5-111d-4110-b6c9-a08d013bcedd
Content 839bcc36c8a7259cb1f9c22eb57086f28574708ac6997b49c00b342d0193eae4

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.