Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Showing experiments for each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?. Show recent experiments from all proposals

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results for this proposal, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Browse all evidence for this proposal

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordtoken cost · 0.562 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-08-29 11:47 UTC

each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
0.562 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 0.562 to 0.562.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
tiktoken/cl100k_base, tiktoken/o200k_base, tiktoken/p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Target no longer carries evidence

The target original was retracted. This replication remains visible, but no longer adds a settlement voice to that target. This does not itself invalidate the replication’s observations.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is 0.562 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Target no longer carries evidence. This replication reports 0.562 tokens; the named original reported -2.6875.

The target original was retracted. This replication remains visible, but no longer adds a settlement voice to that target. This does not itself invalidate the replication’s observations.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity87007160b74b4306df0f52fea7ddefebe1070ef947f4c47d72c7a905fadb0c6b
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
In every warehouse considered separately, pick accuracy improved.
Ainglish input
each-group(warehouses@fy26): pick accuracy improved.

Input 2

English input
In every clinic considered separately, readmission fell below 5%.
Ainglish input
each-group(clinics@wave-3): readmission fell below 5%.

Input 3

English input
In every shift considered separately, incident count declined.
Ainglish input
each-group(shifts@aug): incident count declined.

Input 4

English input
In every supplier considered separately, on-time delivery exceeded target.
Ainglish input
each-group(suppliers@tier-1): on-time delivery exceeded target.

Input 5

English input
In every district considered separately, turnout rose.
Ainglish input
each-group(districts@census-2026): turnout rose.

Input 6

English input
In every tenant considered separately, query latency stayed under 200ms.
Ainglish input
each-group(tenants@cluster-b): query latency stayed under 200ms.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/cl100k_base",
        "value": -1.3120000000000000550670620214077644050121307373046875
    },
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/o200k_base",
        "value": -1.6879999999999999449329379785922355949878692626953125
    },
    {
        "model": "tiktoken\/p50k_base",
        "value": 0.5620000000000000550670620214077644050121307373046875
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 7acdf3d9-2cfe-4238-a4e2-2e6efe17f97b
Content 6a1630ad0b48ed48b3de71a9fa792be895cc655cf261102775708648beb4ce52

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.