These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
24 frozen complete refutation notices across 24 domains; each names a claim, instrument, observed change and executable re-check path
Second result
24 frozen complete refutation notices across 24 domains; each names a claim, instrument, observed change and executable re-check path
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
one complete claim/instrument/delta refutation notice
Second result
one complete claim/instrument/delta refutation notice
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base",
"p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the single falsum-ref stratum"
}
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the single falsum-ref stratum"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
{
"id": "falsum-ref",
"weight": 1
}
]
Second result
[
{
"id": "falsum-ref",
"weight": 1
}
]
First result: full recordtoken cost · -7.125 tokens per declared item
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-7.125 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -10 to -7.125.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 1 declared conditions
falsum-ref
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
falsum-ref
-7.125
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · reef-oxygen
English input
The claim reef-oxygen-stable is refuted by the observation named buoy-DO-17, whose observable delta is: dissolved oxygen fell from 7.1 to 4.8 mg/L; re-read buoy DO-17 channel 2.
Ainglish input
reef-oxygen-stable ⊥(buoy-DO-17→dissolved oxygen fell from 7.1 to 4.8 mg/L; re-read buoy DO-17 channel 2)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 2 · rail-clearance
English input
The claim tunnel-clearance-valid is refuted by the observation named laser-scan-L44, whose observable delta is: the minimum clearance changed from 310 to 274 mm; rerun profile L44 at chainage 8.2 km.
Ainglish input
tunnel-clearance-valid ⊥(laser-scan-L44→the minimum clearance changed from 310 to 274 mm; rerun profile L44 at chainage 8.2 km)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 3 · archive-fixity
English input
The claim archive-bundle-intact is refuted by the observation named sha256-audit, whose observable delta is: object 6F now hashes to 91c2 rather than 77ad; hash object 6F from the sealed copy.
Ainglish input
archive-bundle-intact ⊥(sha256-audit→object 6F now hashes to 91c2 rather than 77ad; hash object 6F from the sealed copy)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 4 · trial-balance
English input
The claim trial-balance-equal is refuted by the observation named ledger-query-Q9, whose observable delta is: debits exceed credits by 420 GBP; rerun saved query Q9 on journal 2026-09.
Ainglish input
trial-balance-equal ⊥(ledger-query-Q9→debits exceed credits by 420 GBP; rerun saved query Q9 on journal 2026-09)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 5 · cold-room
English input
The claim cold-room-compliant is refuted by the observation named thermistor-T12, whose observable delta is: temperature rose from 3.4 to 9.2 C for 18 minutes; replay logger T12 interval 02:10-02:28.
Ainglish input
cold-room-compliant ⊥(thermistor-T12→temperature rose from 3.4 to 9.2 C for 18 minutes; replay logger T12 interval 02:10-02:28)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 6 · orbital-clock
English input
The claim orbital-clock-synced is refuted by the observation named telemetry-frame-812, whose observable delta is: clock offset increased from 4 to 83 ms; decode field 19 in frame 812.
Ainglish input
orbital-clock-synced ⊥(telemetry-frame-812→clock offset increased from 4 to 83 ms; decode field 19 in frame 812)
Condition
falsum-ref
Recorded input digest: f9be4cf873fb43f02462403e95ce003f270a95f1520460282dc8794783030df1
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
<claim> ⊥(<instrument>→<delta>) versus the registered complete English mapping with identical claim, instrument and load-bearing observable delta
Tested population
24 frozen complete refutation notices across 24 domains; each names a claim, instrument, observed change and executable re-check path
Unit tested
one complete claim/instrument/delta refutation notice
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the single falsum-ref stratum
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-7.8333333333333 tokens per declared item Reported interval: -10.541666666667 to -7.8333333333333.
Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 1 declared conditions
falsum-ref
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports -7.8333333333333 tokens; the named original reported -7.125.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
0 of 24 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 24 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
falsum-ref
-7.8333333333333
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ex-falsum-20260919-transect-plastic
English input
The claim transect-contains-no-plastic is refuted by the observation named sample-sort-Mica, whose observable delta is: sample bag 42 contains a plastic fragment where the recorded count was zero; inspect the sealed bag image and sorting log Mica-42.
Ainglish input
transect-contains-no-plastic ⊥(sample-sort-Mica→sample bag 42 contains a plastic fragment where the recorded count was zero; inspect the sealed bag image and sorting log Mica-42)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 2 · ex-falsum-20260919-signal-aspect
English input
The claim signal-lamp-is-red is refuted by the observation named aspect-camera-Fern, whose observable delta is: the recorded lamp aspect changed from red to green; inspect frames 804 and 805 in capture Fern.
Ainglish input
signal-lamp-is-red ⊥(aspect-camera-Fern→the recorded lamp aspect changed from red to green; inspect frames 804 and 805 in capture Fern)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 3 · ex-falsum-20260919-catalogue-links
English input
The claim catalogue-links-all-resolve is refuted by the observation named link-check-Larch, whose observable delta is: catalogue entry 63 now returns HTTP 404 instead of HTTP 200; replay the saved request against snapshot Larch.
Ainglish input
catalogue-links-all-resolve ⊥(link-check-Larch→catalogue entry 63 now returns HTTP 404 instead of HTTP 200; replay the saved request against snapshot Larch)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 4 · ex-falsum-20260919-expense-approval
English input
The claim every-expense-has-approval is refuted by the observation named approval-join-Birch, whose observable delta is: expense 918 now appears without a matching approval row; rerun the saved join on ledger snapshot Birch.
Ainglish input
every-expense-has-approval ⊥(approval-join-Birch→expense 918 now appears without a matching approval row; rerun the saved join on ledger snapshot Birch)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 5 · ex-falsum-20260919-carton-codes
English input
The claim every-carton-has-lot-code is refuted by the observation named label-camera-Reed, whose observable delta is: carton 54 has a blank lot-code field where the packing record lists a code; inspect the native label image Reed-54.
Ainglish input
every-carton-has-lot-code ⊥(label-camera-Reed→carton 54 has a blank lot-code field where the packing record lists a code; inspect the native label image Reed-54)
Condition
falsum-ref
Input 6 · ex-falsum-20260919-antenna-pointing
English input
The claim pointing-error-below-two-degrees is refuted by the observation named attitude-fit-Wren, whose observable delta is: pointing error increased from one to nineteen degrees; recompute the fit from telemetry bundle Wren-7.
Ainglish input
pointing-error-below-two-degrees ⊥(attitude-fit-Wren→pointing error increased from one to nineteen degrees; recompute the fit from telemetry bundle Wren-7)
Condition
falsum-ref
Recorded input digest: e04b4b7fad3558fb10cc603671b02337c637a36b1c95fcf3d1161536d9e7521c
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
<claim> ⊥(<instrument>→<delta>) versus the registered complete English mapping with identical claim, instrument and load-bearing observable delta
Tested population
24 frozen complete refutation notices across 24 domains; each names a claim, instrument, observed change and executable re-check path
Unit tested
one complete claim/instrument/delta refutation notice
How results combine
equal item mean per tokenizer, then least-favourable maximum tokenizer mean; retain the single falsum-ref stratum
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
