These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
32 fixed fresh pairs, 16 per form, declared six-domain authority/target grid and force/voice mix
Second result
32 fixed fresh pairs, 16 per form, declared six-domain authority/target grid and force/voice mix
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
one complete meaning-matched utterance pair
Second result
one complete meaning-matched utterance pair
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
]
Second result
[
"cl100k_base",
"o200k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "Unrounded arithmetic mean of all 32 pairs per tokenizer; the maximum tokenizer mean over cl100k_base and o200k_base is the least-favourable headline. Member span is not sampling uncertainty."
}
Second result
{
"reducer": "least_favourable",
"rule": "Unrounded arithmetic mean of all 32 pairs per tokenizer; the maximum tokenizer mean over cl100k_base and o200k_base is the least-favourable headline. Member span is not sampling uncertainty."
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordtoken cost · 1.0625 tokens per declared item
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
1.0625 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 0.4375 to 1.0625.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed, with disagreement visible
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is 1.0625 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed, with disagreement visible.
A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · SC-1-sanction-allow
English input
Fictional record SC-1. The named authority is the Licensing Panel; the target is Mara's pilot licence. The recorded act is effective now. The Licensing Panel formally permitted Mara's pilot licence.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SC-1. The named authority is the Licensing Panel; the target is Mara's pilot licence. The recorded act is effective now. sanction-allow(Licensing Panel): Mara's pilot licence.
Input 2 · SC-1-sanction-penalize
English input
Fictional record SC-1. The named authority is the Licensing Panel; the target is Mara's pilot licence. The recorded act is effective now. The Licensing Panel formally imposed a penalty on Mara's pilot licence.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SC-1. The named authority is the Licensing Panel; the target is Mara's pilot licence. The recorded act is effective now. sanction-penalize(Licensing Panel): Mara's pilot licence.
Input 3 · SC-2-sanction-allow
English input
Fictional record SC-2. The named authority is the Trade Board; the target is the Alder import company. The recorded act takes effect next Monday. The Alder import company was formally permitted by the Trade Board.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SC-2. The named authority is the Trade Board; the target is the Alder import company. The recorded act takes effect next Monday. sanction-allow(Trade Board): the Alder import company.
Input 4 · SC-2-sanction-penalize
English input
Fictional record SC-2. The named authority is the Trade Board; the target is the Alder import company. The recorded act takes effect next Monday. A penalty on the Alder import company was formally imposed by the Trade Board.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SC-2. The named authority is the Trade Board; the target is the Alder import company. The recorded act takes effect next Monday. sanction-penalize(Trade Board): the Alder import company.
Input 5 · SC-3-sanction-allow
English input
Fictional record SC-3. The named authority is the Payments Committee; the target is the Cedar transfer. The recorded act expired yesterday. The Payments Committee formally permitted the Cedar transfer.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SC-3. The named authority is the Payments Committee; the target is the Cedar transfer. The recorded act expired yesterday. sanction-allow(Payments Committee): the Cedar transfer.
Input 6 · SC-3-sanction-penalize
English input
Fictional record SC-3. The named authority is the Payments Committee; the target is the Cedar transfer. The recorded act expired yesterday. The Payments Committee formally imposed a penalty on the Cedar transfer.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SC-3. The named authority is the Payments Committee; the target is the Cedar transfer. The recorded act expired yesterday. sanction-penalize(Payments Committee): the Cedar transfer.
Recorded input digest: 9b2f400c20ffff36ad72de01962cf47c4987e1b2f985139b1cad8f511b15e337
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish minus full careful-English formal-act disclosure
Tested population
32 fixed fresh pairs, 16 per form, declared six-domain authority/target grid and force/voice mix
Unit tested
one complete meaning-matched utterance pair
How results combine
Unrounded arithmetic mean of all 32 pairs per tokenizer; the maximum tokenizer mean over cl100k_base and o200k_base is the least-favourable headline. Member span is not sampling uncertainty.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
1 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 0.4375 to 1.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Agrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is 1 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original.
This replication reports 1 tokens; the named original reported 1.0625.
This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · SR-101-sanction-allow
English input
Fictional record SR-101. The named authority is the Licensing Council; the target is Talia's drone certificate. The recorded act is effective now. The Licensing Council formally permitted Talia's drone certificate.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SR-101. The named authority is the Licensing Council; the target is Talia's drone certificate. The recorded act is effective now. sanction-allow(Licensing Council): Talia's drone certificate.
Input 2 · SR-101-sanction-penalize
English input
Fictional record SR-101. The named authority is the Licensing Council; the target is Talia's drone certificate. The recorded act is effective now. The Licensing Council formally imposed a penalty on Talia's drone certificate.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SR-101. The named authority is the Licensing Council; the target is Talia's drone certificate. The recorded act is effective now. sanction-penalize(Licensing Council): Talia's drone certificate.
Input 3 · SR-102-sanction-allow
English input
Fictional record SR-102. The named authority is the Commerce Tribunal; the target is the Fir logistics company. The recorded act takes effect next Tuesday. The Fir logistics company was formally permitted by the Commerce Tribunal.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SR-102. The named authority is the Commerce Tribunal; the target is the Fir logistics company. The recorded act takes effect next Tuesday. sanction-allow(Commerce Tribunal): the Fir logistics company.
Input 4 · SR-102-sanction-penalize
English input
Fictional record SR-102. The named authority is the Commerce Tribunal; the target is the Fir logistics company. The recorded act takes effect next Tuesday. A penalty on the Fir logistics company was formally imposed by the Commerce Tribunal.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SR-102. The named authority is the Commerce Tribunal; the target is the Fir logistics company. The recorded act takes effect next Tuesday. sanction-penalize(Commerce Tribunal): the Fir logistics company.
Input 5 · SR-103-sanction-allow
English input
Fictional record SR-103. The named authority is the Clearing Board; the target is the Pine remittance. The recorded act expired last Friday. The Clearing Board formally permitted the Pine remittance.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SR-103. The named authority is the Clearing Board; the target is the Pine remittance. The recorded act expired last Friday. sanction-allow(Clearing Board): the Pine remittance.
Input 6 · SR-103-sanction-penalize
English input
Fictional record SR-103. The named authority is the Clearing Board; the target is the Pine remittance. The recorded act expired last Friday. The Clearing Board formally imposed a penalty on the Pine remittance.
Ainglish input
Fictional record SR-103. The named authority is the Clearing Board; the target is the Pine remittance. The recorded act expired last Friday. sanction-penalize(Clearing Board): the Pine remittance.
Recorded input digest: a309e20b8c0549817671258dbefdaf9e4de2166c2f51d3f96f72d19c5bda03f1
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Ainglish minus full careful-English formal-act disclosure
Tested population
32 fixed fresh pairs, 16 per form, declared six-domain authority/target grid and force/voice mix
Unit tested
one complete meaning-matched utterance pair
How results combine
Unrounded arithmetic mean of all 32 pairs per tokenizer; the maximum tokenizer mean over cl100k_base and o200k_base is the least-favourable headline. Member span is not sampling uncertainty.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
