Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

First result · 2026-09-03 12:43 UTC

part-chosen(<rule>) / part-capped(<limiter>) — was the edge of the set you examined your decision or the instrument's?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-15.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -15.5625 to -15.5.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

part-capped, part-chosen

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Confirmed, with disagreement visible

A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Reported token direction. Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

Current declared cost bound: at most 8 tokens. This bound applies to the Ainglish-minus-English difference. The reported point value is within that bound. This uses the current declaration, not necessarily the one in force when the result was filed.

A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`part-capped`	-15.25	Not recorded
`part-chosen`	-15.75	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Showing the first 3 of 16 readable, inline non-control items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items omitted.

Input 1

English input: I examined the 48 alerts that the severity-quartile rule chose, out of the 193 recorded; the rule picked which alerts to examine.
Ainglish input: part-chosen(severity-quartile): the 48 alerts.
Condition: part-chosen

Input 2

English input: I reviewed the 72 suppliers that the alphabetic-slice rule chose, out of the 418 listed; the rule picked which suppliers to review.
Ainglish input: part-chosen(alphabetic-slice): the 72 suppliers.
Condition: part-chosen

Input 3

English input: I inspected the 96 sessions that random seed 77 chose, out of the 630 captured; that rule picked which sessions to inspect.
Ainglish input: part-chosen(random-seed-77): the 96 sessions.
Condition: part-chosen

Recorded input digest: fe2831507843811435c7a3511d420c9e83d0981eacdf1ee197ef62cb5de333a0

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: Ainglish form versus complete careful English
Tested population: 16 frozen fresh pairs across part-capped and part-chosen
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean per stratum, weighted by stratum share, then maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -15.5625
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -15.5
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "part-capped",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -15.25,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "part-chosen",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -15.75,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 8dbf38ab-f6db-4a80-848a-ecc32fb2cdab
Content 13a722dd4d8b0206a42ff6450c5de1fea05a0f828d14254c61889bd7af894e83

Second result · 2026-09-06 11:03 UTC

part-chosen(<rule>) / part-capped(<limiter>) — was the edge of the set you examined your decision or the instrument's?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-15.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -16.3125 to -15.5.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

part-capped, part-chosen

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reported token direction. Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

A numerical match is not a completed prerequisite. Current evidence status, independent settlement and the other declared results still determine readiness.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

Declared target content identity

13a722dd4d8b0206a42ff6450c5de1fea05a0f828d14254c61889bd7af894e83

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`part-capped`	-13.875	Not recorded
`part-chosen`	-17.125	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Showing the first 3 of 16 readable, inline non-control items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items omitted.

Input 1

English input: I reviewed the 36 tickets that the priority-band rule chose, out of the 214 filed; the rule picked which tickets to review.
Ainglish input: part-chosen(priority-band): the 36 tickets.
Condition: part-chosen

Input 2

English input: I sampled the 25 parcels that the weight-class rule chose, out of the 410 scanned; the rule picked which parcels to sample.
Ainglish input: part-chosen(weight-class): the 25 parcels.
Condition: part-chosen

Input 3

English input: I audited the 52 logins that the hour-block rule chose, out of the 1930 recorded; the rule picked which logins to audit.
Ainglish input: part-chosen(hour-block): the 52 logins.
Condition: part-chosen

Recorded input digest: 8adbfd2935de34b4e7a6a49130ffb9cc0d6a120d82ff7e0f667f6c2f877b0df9

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: Ainglish form versus complete careful English
Tested population: 16 frozen fresh pairs across part-capped and part-chosen
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean per stratum, weighted by stratum share, then maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -16.3125
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -15.5
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "part-capped",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -13.875,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "part-chosen",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": -17.125,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 6a8ed795-5047-4308-876a-1b8944dddf59
Content 5bff54085222e79b761ea9ab7591b24c38aadd8f739a79c563d0acd2bb44b2a4

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.