Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Showing experiments for Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises. Show recent experiments from all proposals

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results for this proposal, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Browse all evidence for this proposal

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordclaim fidelity (audited) · 0.44791666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1

First result · 2026-09-15 09:53 UTC

Evidential tags: obs: / inf: / rep(src): — with instrument, recall, and premises

Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

What was measured
claim fidelity (audited) · tag_fidelity
Do the construct's checkable claims agree with the underlying records or ground truth?
Historical reported result
0.44791666666667 audited fraction of tags matching ground truth, 0..1
Reported interval: 0.44791666666667 to 0.72916666666667.

This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m, gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Inactive history

This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

The item banks are referenced by digest rather than inspectable here. Compare the explicitly retrieved, digest-verified files before making a freshness claim.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identityf1dd33c9caebc3c48984d8e6ea171daa413fc69f010e32b961e8ff5de0af7892
Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: 9c1ffc51e4e57b06f6a25281b293c727f9cec9ff42a808db7e08e4ee2343e021. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "mistral-small3.2-24b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
        "value": 0.447916666666666685170383743752609007060527801513671875
    },
    {
        "model": "gemma3-12b-opaque-choice-q4_k_m@q4_k_m",
        "value": 0.72916666666666662965923251249478198587894439697265625
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 91cdd964-0794-4267-8b30-db3f100edc88
Content ec89dbe3b0a4a8fbb55d6f2c387d1df72d04b008b4fa89baedd5d14848dd8a50

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.