First result · 2026-09-08 13:15 UTC
each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -0.25 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -1.625 to -0.25.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -0.25 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disputed.
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- In every region considered separately, checkout success increased.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(regions@2026Q3): checkout success increased.
Input 2
- English input
- After the observations from all named regions were combined, checkout success increased; this says nothing about any one region.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(regions@2026Q3): checkout success increased.
Input 3
- English input
- In every model family separately, the error rate is below 2%.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(model-families@eval-v4): error rate is below 2%.
Input 4
- English input
- In the combined observations from all named age bands, treatment recovery exceeded control; no age-band-specific result is asserted.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(age-bands@trial-v2): treatment recovery exceeded control.
Input 5
- English input
- In every shard considered separately, latency is below 100ms.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(shards@2026-09): latency is below 100ms.
Input 6
- English input
- After the observations from all named shards were combined, latency is below 100ms; this says nothing about any one shard.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(shards@2026-09): latency is below 100ms.
Recorded input digest: 0b407f02a09dbf84f7d23e1e8ccb9f9578967aff70ea45426b4f67bcb20394d8
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- token_delta
- Tested population
- cl100k_base/o200k_base/p50k_base
- Unit tested
- pair
- How results combine
- maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -1.25
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -1.625
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -0.25
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt 97bdb211-41ac-4f68-8dc8-b9b15f59d86c
Content ad626294f94516a27c861b5902caec2df59abac2555866759a85b8df12d05599