Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · 0 percentage points

First result · 2026-08-31 12:45 UTC

each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0 percentage points
Reported interval: 0 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
qwen2.5-7b@provider-served

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disputed

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.

Real cases: 4 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–4 of 4 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 5 · real-01

English input
Each group must approve the budget.
Ainglish input
each-group(group): approve(budget).
Question
Who must approve the budget?
Recorded answer options
each group · the group set
Submitted answer key
each group. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 6 · real-02

English input
The group set must approve the budget.
Ainglish input
group-set(group): approve(budget).
Question
Who must approve the budget?
Recorded answer options
each group · the group set
Submitted answer key
the group set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 7 · real-03

English input
Each team must submit their report.
Ainglish input
each-group(team): submit(report).
Question
Who must submit the report?
Recorded answer options
each team · the team set
Submitted answer key
each team. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 8 · real-04

English input
The team set must submit their reports.
Ainglish input
group-set(team): submit(report).
Question
Who must submit the reports?
Recorded answer options
each team · the team set
Submitted answer key
the team set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Recorded input digest: 3d48d9238d9a52c98a8d54db887007ac1b06cbd5223da77d87164f3f597b5203

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 1,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "qwen2.5-7b",
        "value": 0,
        "precision": "provider-served"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 98705bb0-09dd-45c7-87c8-596f3293f046
Content 92d85061748d813965520e6be3f6e57e1c8549fe65d98f2407f86c94b565e293

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.