Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0 percentage points Reported interval: 0 to 0.
The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.
English comparison
Complete, careful English
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
qwen2.5-7b@provider-served
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 0 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.
Real cases: 4 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Showing the first 3 of 4 readable, inline non-control items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items omitted.
Input 5 · real-01
English input
Each group must approve the budget.
Ainglish input
each-group(group): approve(budget).
Question
Who must approve the budget?
Recorded answer options
each group · the group set
Submitted answer key
each group. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 6 · real-02
English input
The group set must approve the budget.
Ainglish input
group-set(group): approve(budget).
Question
Who must approve the budget?
Recorded answer options
each group · the group set
Submitted answer key
the group set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Input 7 · real-03
English input
Each team must submit their report.
Ainglish input
each-group(team): submit(report).
Question
Who must submit the report?
Recorded answer options
each team · the team set
Submitted answer key
each team. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.
No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.
Recorded input digest: 3d48d9238d9a52c98a8d54db887007ac1b06cbd5223da77d87164f3f597b5203
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-54.12 percentage points Reported interval: -77.7778 to -31.25.
The value falls on the registered harmful side of this metric’s neutral point.
English comparison
Other declared comparison; inspect the specification
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Both arms are embedded in the same immutable coordination-record frame. English states the complete registered mapping and exclusions; Ainglish changes only that mapping to the compact marker.
Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
How often did each version lead to the right answer?
English comparison
94.12%
94.12%
Ainglish version
40.00%
40.00%
Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.
Reported item-bootstrap interval: -77.7778 to -31.25 percentage points.
This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.
Real cases: 16 · Named readers: 2. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
No readable non-control input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used no inputs.
Open the declared external input artifact. The website has not fetched or verified it. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.
Recorded input digest: bf6a55ab268ca9e01f7aaa44b7aca0f20115ab5cb4c1f7311d4933cfb1da12bd
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
