Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?2026-08-31 12:45 UTCeach-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?2026-09-03 12:16 UTC
What was measured?comprehension accuracyHow does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?comprehension accuracyHow does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
What was the result?0 percentage pointsReported interval: 0 to 0Not yet counting in evidence decisions-25 percentage pointsReported interval: -75 to 0Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?Complete, careful EnglishReader exposure not recorded as a structured labelComplete, careful EnglishReader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Independently settled?DisputedEligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
Second result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Second result
[
    "complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Recorded values differ
First result
[
    "qwen2.5-7b@provider-served"
]
Second result
[
    "spark-zen-13-minimal"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · 0 percentage points

First result · 2026-08-31 12:45 UTC

each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?

Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
0 percentage points
Reported interval: 0 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
qwen2.5-7b@provider-served

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disputed

Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
100.00%
100.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported interval (method not identified here): 0 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

The reported accuracy is near a measurement boundary; read the resolution diagnostics before claiming a small effect.

Real cases: 4 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–4 of 4 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 5 · real-01

English input
Each group must approve the budget.
Ainglish input
each-group(group): approve(budget).
Question
Who must approve the budget?
Recorded answer options
each group · the group set
Submitted answer key
each group. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 6 · real-02

English input
The group set must approve the budget.
Ainglish input
group-set(group): approve(budget).
Question
Who must approve the budget?
Recorded answer options
each group · the group set
Submitted answer key
the group set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 7 · real-03

English input
Each team must submit their report.
Ainglish input
each-group(team): submit(report).
Question
Who must submit the report?
Recorded answer options
each team · the team set
Submitted answer key
each team. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Input 8 · real-04

English input
The team set must submit their reports.
Ainglish input
group-set(team): submit(report).
Question
Who must submit the reports?
Recorded answer options
each team · the team set
Submitted answer key
the team set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

No per-item reader answers are stored alongside this inline example.

Recorded input digest: 3d48d9238d9a52c98a8d54db887007ac1b06cbd5223da77d87164f3f597b5203

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 1,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "qwen2.5-7b",
        "value": 0,
        "precision": "provider-served"
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 98705bb0-09dd-45c7-87c8-596f3293f046
Content 92d85061748d813965520e6be3f6e57e1c8549fe65d98f2407f86c94b565e293

Second result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -25 percentage points

Second result · 2026-09-03 12:16 UTC

each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-25 percentage points
Reported interval: -75 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Complete careful-English expansion.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
spark-zen-13-minimal

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disagrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity92d85061748d813965520e6be3f6e57e1c8549fe65d98f2407f86c94b565e293

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
75.00%
75.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -75 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 8 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 5 · real-01

English input
Each unit must audit the ledger.
Ainglish input
each-group(unit): audit(ledger).
Question
Who must audit the ledger?
Recorded answer options
each unit · the unit set
Submitted answer key
each unit. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.

Input 6 · real-01b

English input
The unit set must audit the ledger.
Ainglish input
group-set(unit): audit(ledger).
Question
Who must audit the ledger?
Recorded answer options
the unit set · each unit
Submitted answer key
the unit set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 7 · real-02

English input
Each squad must inspect the inventory.
Ainglish input
each-group(squad): inspect(inventory).
Question
Who must inspect the inventory?
Recorded answer options
the squad set · each squad
Submitted answer key
each squad. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 8 · real-02b

English input
The squad set must inspect the inventory.
Ainglish input
group-set(squad): inspect(inventory).
Question
Who must inspect the inventory?
Recorded answer options
each squad · the squad set
Submitted answer key
the squad set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 9 · real-03

English input
Each panel must sign the charter.
Ainglish input
each-group(panel): sign(charter).
Question
Who must sign the charter?
Recorded answer options
each panel · the panel set
Submitted answer key
each panel. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 10 · real-03b

English input
The panel set must sign the charter.
Ainglish input
group-set(panel): sign(charter).
Question
Who must sign the charter?
Recorded answer options
each panel · the panel set
Submitted answer key
the panel set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Recorded input digest: 30dce11048043ea9b4436f3183b80cf17b3ad015e33a232beb5ef6733e40d75c

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 0.75,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "spark-zen-13-minimal",
        "value": -25
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt aa619c54-3208-4ffd-9742-451acd2f94ea
Content 89a9557e4bc4d9928cefeb7ee9114821e7228cb557099e1b0a5a7a9e27408f3d

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.