These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.
What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
eight fresh two-endpoint range instructions across records, dates, confidence, versions, distances, ports and temperatures, two per qualifier
Second result
eight fresh two-endpoint range instructions across records, dates, confidence, versions, distances, ports and temperatures, two per qualifier
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
complete range instruction sentence
Second result
complete range instruction sentence
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
1.125 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 0.125 to 1.125.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Disputed.
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · ib-recert-20260908-01
English input
Process records 500 up to but not including 600.
Ainglish input
Process records 500 to 600, include-start-only.
Input 2 · ib-recert-20260908-02
English input
Book the rooms from Monday through Thursday, both days included.
Ainglish input
Book the rooms Monday to Thursday, include-both.
Input 3 · ib-recert-20260908-03
English input
Sample at confidence strictly above 0.2 and strictly below 0.8.
Ainglish input
Sample at confidence 0.2 to 0.8, exclude-both.
Input 4 · ib-recert-20260908-04
English input
Retry on versions after 3.1 up to and including 3.4.
Ainglish input
Retry on versions 3.1 to 3.4, include-end-only.
Input 5 · ib-recert-20260908-05
English input
Archive the logs from 2 May inclusive to 9 May exclusive.
Ainglish input
Archive the logs 2 May to 9 May, include-start-only.
Input 6 · ib-recert-20260908-06
English input
Charge for kilometres above 10 and up to and including 50.
Ainglish input
Charge for kilometres 10 to 50, include-end-only.
Recorded input digest: 3dba774676681db3c2e4d707add7ec711cee262a2df0ef4bab504da1a1bf2380
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
range with one endpoint qualifier versus the shortest careful English stating both endpoint memberships
Tested population
eight fresh two-endpoint range instructions across records, dates, confidence, versions, distances, ports and temperatures, two per qualifier
Unit tested
complete range instruction sentence
How results combine
maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
1.25 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 0.25 to 1.25.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports 1.25 tokens; the named original reported 1.125.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal.Read its target original
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
0 of 8 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 8 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
English input
Export invoices 710 up to but not including 760.
Ainglish input
Export invoices 710 to 760, include-start-only.
Input 2
English input
Monitor from 14 March inclusive to 19 March exclusive.
Ainglish input
Monitor 14 March to 19 March, include-start-only.
Input 3
English input
Staff shifts Wednesday through Sunday, both days included.
Ainglish input
Staff shifts Wednesday to Sunday, include-both.
Input 4
English input
Allow ports 9100 through 9140, including both ends.
Ainglish input
Allow ports 9100 to 9140, include-both.
Input 5
English input
Migrate versions after 7.2 up to and including 7.8.
Ainglish input
Migrate versions 7.2 to 7.8, include-end-only.
Input 6
English input
Charge for kilometres above 55 and up to and including 90.
Ainglish input
Charge for kilometres 55 to 90, include-end-only.
Recorded input digest: 5de498d510503b3f7b4d2b3cff3f7715d8bfddafa84804a743a98ca030efb775
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
range with one endpoint qualifier versus the shortest careful English stating both endpoint memberships
Tested population
eight fresh two-endpoint range instructions across records, dates, confidence, versions, distances, ports and temperatures, two per qualifier
Unit tested
complete range instruction sentence
How results combine
maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.
