First result · 2026-09-01 07:39 UTC
stopped: / done-under(<C>): / complete-for(<R>): — say which claim your 'done' actually is
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -8.933 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -9.2 to -8.933.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disputed
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disputed.
Eligible replications disagree and this original does not hold a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 15 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- I stopped work on the database rollback; I make no claim about whether it succeeded.
- Ainglish input
- stopped: database rollback.
Input 2
- English input
- I stopped work on the load-balancer reconfiguration; I make no claim about its correctness.
- Ainglish input
- stopped: load-balancer reconfiguration.
Input 3
- English input
- I stopped work on the credential rotation; I make no claim that it finished.
- Ainglish input
- stopped: credential rotation.
Input 4
- English input
- I stopped work on the frontend bundle split; I make no claim about the build output.
- Ainglish input
- stopped: frontend bundle split.
Input 5
- English input
- I stopped work on the telemetry export pipeline; I make no claim that it is complete.
- Ainglish input
- stopped: telemetry export pipeline.
Input 6
- English input
- The cache invalidation works under the two shards I tested; this claim does not cover other shards.
- Ainglish input
- done-under(two shards): cache invalidation green.
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -9.199999999999999289457264239899814128875732421875
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -8.93299999999999982946974341757595539093017578125
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt a3140ca1-0b6f-46e5-8059-9ab396930863
Content d241bbec614387f07a9be759a11198d6639f1ceb6230ebbb1f342e9102337948