First result · 2026-09-09 18:42 UTC
consider-now / postpone — did ‘table the proposal’ put it before the meeting, or take it off the agenda?
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -8.5 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -8.5 to -8.5.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
consider-now,postponeAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- No independent settlement voice
The retained eligibility decision does not give this row a settlement voice. Reused inputs, related participants or other recorded restrictions may explain that decision; this label alone does not identify the cause.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -8.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- No independent settlement voice.
This replication reports -8.5 tokens; the named original reported -8.5.
The retained eligibility decision does not give this row a settlement voice. Reused inputs, related participants or other recorded restrictions may explain that decision; this label alone does not identify the cause.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.
How much input text was reused?
0.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
731894e988bbb6a473703d55ba259d137fe53ace009c7e792345edd2e036161aDoes the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
consider-now | -5 | Not recorded |
postpone | -12 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 64 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · public-governance-1-consider-now
- English input
- Put the clinic-hearing motion before this meeting for consideration now.
- Ainglish input
- consider-now(the clinic-hearing motion).
- Condition
- consider-now
Input 2 · public-governance-1-postpone
- English input
- Do not take the clinic-hearing motion up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
- Ainglish input
- postpone(the clinic-hearing motion).
- Condition
- postpone
Input 3 · public-governance-2-consider-now
- English input
- Put the bus-route review before this meeting for consideration now.
- Ainglish input
- consider-now(the bus-route review).
- Condition
- consider-now
Input 4 · public-governance-2-postpone
- English input
- Do not take the bus-route review up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
- Ainglish input
- postpone(the bus-route review).
- Condition
- postpone
Input 5 · public-governance-3-consider-now
- English input
- Put the allotment budget before this meeting for consideration now.
- Ainglish input
- consider-now(the allotment budget).
- Condition
- consider-now
Input 6 · public-governance-3-postpone
- English input
- Do not take the allotment budget up in this meeting; keep it for possible later consideration.
- Ainglish input
- postpone(the allotment budget).
- Condition
- postpone
Recorded input digest: d90674723e2488ae82a675219d9e63ee879d88164d9d028d17f8867f5ed6b0b5
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Ainglish minus complete careful English in current tokenizer units; negative is fewer tokens, positive is a premium
- Tested population
- Prospectively authored complete procedural mappings: 8 declared domains, 4 new matter references per domain, each in consider-now and postpone. Natural-language matter labels are identical in both arms; same English templates and equal form/domain weights.
- Unit tested
- one complete meaning-matched utterance pair including all shared contextual text
- How results combine
- Equal-weight form/force strata, equal domain/reference cells within each stratum; maximum tokenizer mean is the least-favourable headline. No rounding.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -8.5
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -8.5
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "consider-now",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -5,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "postpone",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.5,
"value": -12,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt a7b54546-4291-4ff6-8f04-47196ea71335
Content 026a2d70053fcfb09a257abdc3ba6f452f315ed43a4a1f9b6836257abccac13a