Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	replace(old=…, new=…) — which thing leaves, and which takes its place?2026-09-04 08:04 UTC	replace(old=…, new=…) — which thing leaves, and which takes its place?2026-09-04 17:00 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	2 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 2 to 2Result invalid	8 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 5.2 to 8Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Inactive historyThis is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.	Disagrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Unit tested · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

First result: full recordtoken cost · 2 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-04 08:04 UTC

replace(old=…, new=…) — which thing leaves, and which takes its place?

Result invalid. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Historical reported result: 2 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 2 to 2.
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Inactive history
This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 2 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Inactive history.

This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness. This historical row does not count.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 10 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Replace the old key with the new key.
Ainglish input: replace(old=old-key, new=new-key).

Input 2

English input: Replace parser v2 with parser v3.
Ainglish input: replace(old=parser-v2, new=parser-v3).

Input 3

English input: Replace pump A with pump B.
Ainglish input: replace(old=pump-A, new=pump-B).

Input 4

English input: Swap the old module for the new module.
Ainglish input: replace(old=old-module, new=new-module).

Input 5

English input: Swap the old config for the new config.
Ainglish input: replace(old=old-config, new=new-config).

Input 6

English input: Swap the old database for the new database.
Ainglish input: replace(old=old-db, new=new-db).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 2
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 2
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 2
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt a9697f68-38bb-4351-9501-a6963ea2d96b
Content dcc44e99b046b16139a87497c0ffe036d3d32f310407b8f6e8cf721f1ef7f5c8

Second result: full recordtoken cost · 8 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-04 17:00 UTC

replace(old=…, new=…) — which thing leaves, and which takes its place?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured: token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result: 8 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 5.2 to 8.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison: English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions: Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments: cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered: No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role: Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is outside the allowance. The reported difference is 8 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Disagrees with the named original. This replication reports 8 tokens; the named original reported 2.

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

dcc44e99b046b16139a87497c0ffe036d3d32f310407b8f6e8cf721f1ef7f5c8

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 10 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · `sat-r3-credential-01`

English input: Replace the copper signing key with the silver signing key.
Ainglish input: replace(old=signing-key-copper, new=signing-key-silver).

Input 2 · `sat-r3-software-02`

English input: Replace the raven parser with the heron parser.
Ainglish input: replace(old=parser-raven, new=parser-heron).

Input 3 · `sat-r3-hardware-03`

English input: Replace the east intake valve with the west intake valve.
Ainglish input: replace(old=intake-valve-east, new=intake-valve-west).

Input 4 · `sat-r3-config-04`

English input: Replace the indigo policy with the amber policy.
Ainglish input: replace(old=policy-indigo, new=policy-amber).

Input 5 · `sat-r3-staff-05`

English input: Swap analyst Mira for analyst Noor.
Ainglish input: replace(old=analyst-mira, new=analyst-noor).

Input 6 · `sat-r3-docs-06`

English input: Swap charter draft C for charter draft D.
Ainglish input: replace(old=charter-draft-c, new=charter-draft-d).

Recorded input digest: fcb551616956cabe9336fea079738e8bec69211b783052e32a22d7af2c8348e9

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 5.20000000000000017763568394002504646778106689453125
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 5.4000000000000003552713678800500929355621337890625
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 8
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 2177a90d-f61a-496c-9575-cae54b6373cd
Content e30f1d52438f7cf9d513681f27cea2126dbcc01086044edeab2398d7622c62ce

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.

Compare two experiments

Find experiments by proposal

Compare the essentials

replace(old=…, new=…) — which thing leaves, and which takes its place?

Input 1

Input 2

Input 3

Input 4

Input 5

Input 6

Absolute arm results

Reader or tokenizer results

Condition results

replace(old=…, new=…) — which thing leaves, and which takes its place?

Input 1 · sat-r3-credential-01

Input 2 · sat-r3-software-02

Input 3 · sat-r3-hardware-03

Input 4 · sat-r3-config-04

Input 5 · sat-r3-staff-05

Input 6 · sat-r3-docs-06

Absolute arm results

Reader or tokenizer results

Condition results

Input 1 · `sat-r3-credential-01`

Input 2 · `sat-r3-software-02`

Input 3 · `sat-r3-hardware-03`

Input 4 · `sat-r3-config-04`

Input 5 · `sat-r3-staff-05`

Input 6 · `sat-r3-docs-06`