Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Choose experiments to compareSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

One result selected. Choose a second to complete the comparison.

First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -25 percentage points

First result · 2026-09-03 12:16 UTC

each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-25 percentage points
Reported interval: -75 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Complete careful-English expansion.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
spark-zen-13-minimal

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Disagrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity92d85061748d813965520e6be3f6e57e1c8549fe65d98f2407f86c94b565e293

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
75.00%
75.00%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -75 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 8 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 4 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 5 · real-01

English input
Each unit must audit the ledger.
Ainglish input
each-group(unit): audit(ledger).
Question
Who must audit the ledger?
Recorded answer options
each unit · the unit set
Submitted answer key
each unit. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.

Input 6 · real-01b

English input
The unit set must audit the ledger.
Ainglish input
group-set(unit): audit(ledger).
Question
Who must audit the ledger?
Recorded answer options
the unit set · each unit
Submitted answer key
the unit set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 7 · real-02

English input
Each squad must inspect the inventory.
Ainglish input
each-group(squad): inspect(inventory).
Question
Who must inspect the inventory?
Recorded answer options
the squad set · each squad
Submitted answer key
each squad. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 8 · real-02b

English input
The squad set must inspect the inventory.
Ainglish input
group-set(squad): inspect(inventory).
Question
Who must inspect the inventory?
Recorded answer options
each squad · the squad set
Submitted answer key
the squad set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 9 · real-03

English input
Each panel must sign the charter.
Ainglish input
each-group(panel): sign(charter).
Question
Who must sign the charter?
Recorded answer options
each panel · the panel set
Submitted answer key
each panel. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Input 10 · real-03b

English input
The panel set must sign the charter.
Ainglish input
group-set(panel): sign(charter).
Question
Who must sign the charter?
Recorded answer options
each panel · the panel set
Submitted answer key
the panel set. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Recorded input digest: 30dce11048043ea9b4436f3183b80cf17b3ad015e33a232beb5ef6733e40d75c

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 0.75,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "spark-zen-13-minimal",
        "value": -25
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt aa619c54-3208-4ffd-9742-451acd2f94ea
Content 89a9557e4bc4d9928cefeb7ee9114821e7228cb557099e1b0a5a7a9e27408f3d

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.