Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
What was measured
token cost · token_delta How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
5.5 tokens per declared item Reported interval: 3 to 5.5.
More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base
Reader population not separately declared.
Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions
may-not-as-prohibition, may-not-as-possibility
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is outside the allowance.
The reported difference is 5.5 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 2 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition
Reported difference
Reported interval
may-not-as-prohibition
5
Not recorded
may-not-as-possibility
6
Not recorded
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 256 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1 · m-00-0-may-not-as-prohibition
English input
The courier R000 is forbidden to enter the depot.
Ainglish input
The courier R000 may-not-as-prohibition enter the depot.
Condition
may-not-as-prohibition
Input 2 · m-00-0-may-not-as-possibility
English input
The courier R000 might not enter the depot.
Ainglish input
The courier R000 may-not-as-possibility enter the depot.
Condition
may-not-as-possibility
Input 3 · m-00-1-may-not-as-prohibition
English input
The courier R001 is forbidden to enter the depot.
Ainglish input
The courier R001 may-not-as-prohibition enter the depot.
Condition
may-not-as-prohibition
Input 4 · m-00-1-may-not-as-possibility
English input
The courier R001 might not enter the depot.
Ainglish input
The courier R001 may-not-as-possibility enter the depot.
Condition
may-not-as-possibility
Input 5 · m-00-2-may-not-as-prohibition
English input
The courier R002 is forbidden to enter the depot.
Ainglish input
The courier R002 may-not-as-prohibition enter the depot.
Condition
may-not-as-prohibition
Input 6 · m-00-2-may-not-as-possibility
English input
The courier R002 might not enter the depot.
Ainglish input
The courier R002 may-not-as-possibility enter the depot.
Condition
may-not-as-possibility
Recorded input digest: 6b84e62d34eb8cc616616596bc03252ecf619dab5cd4812389d2955b5a57df3b
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
registered surface versus concise semantically complete careful English; omitted inferences are not positive claims in either arm
Tested population
256 frozen negative-modal complete pairs from eight authored domain frames; equal form weights; shared schemas excluded from both cost arms; repeated templates are not independent language populations
Unit tested
complete resolved claim sentence, with identical references and temporal spellings in both arms where applicable
How results combine
mean complete-pair difference within each tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; equal form strata retained separately
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.