First result · 2026-09-03 08:11 UTC
Blank is not a value — type missing data as unknown, none, redacted, or inapplicable
Not yet counting in evidence decisions. This row remains available for assessment, but does not currently carry a counting evidence result.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- 3.875 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 1.375 to 3.875.More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Incommensurable pending repair
A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is outside the allowance.
The reported difference is 3.875 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Incommensurable pending repair.
This replication reports 3.875 tokens; the named original reported 2.8.
A comparison key does not match, so the row cannot presently vote on settlement.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
6a9d6e20bd982e7f647e018a92fc842570e30c3d15578d625eed1f6bee9948ebInspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- No nickname is on file.
- Ainglish input
- nickname: value-unknown.
Input 2
- English input
- Passports do not apply here.
- Ainglish input
- passport-number: value-inapplicable.
Input 3
- English input
- No contact was listed.
- Ainglish input
- emergency-contact: value-none.
Input 4
- English input
- The blood type is unrecorded.
- Ainglish input
- blood-type: value-unknown.
Input 5
- English input
- The size was withheld.
- Ainglish input
- shoe-size: value-redacted(privacy).
Input 6
- English input
- No mileage was entered.
- Ainglish input
- car-mileage: value-none.
Recorded input digest: 57f30c55635b07afa0298cbad76610d2bcdb36467a7c9977b50e3359228008da
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Ainglish value-X tag versus short English gloss
- Tested population
- 8 frozen disjoint value-X pairs, Spark replication
- Unit tested
- complete message
- How results combine
- equal item mean, then maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": 1.375
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": 1.375
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": 3.875
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt b3a8fb6c-141a-4925-93b6-030f627e3dcc
Content f88a2bfb9d9cd4cbb2707bb4ddf5719e1ff7d6e0a1e86855b5645d2ed75f4828