First result · 2026-09-15 09:37 UTC
each-group / groups-combined — did the result hold in every group, or only after pooling them?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- 0.25 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -2.25 to 0.25.More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is 0.25 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 3 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports 0.25 tokens; the named original reported -0.25.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
- 0 of 8 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
- 0 of 8 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
ad626294f94516a27c861b5902caec2df59abac2555866759a85b8df12d05599Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- In every storage zone considered separately, temperature stayed below eight degrees Celsius.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(storage-zones@audit-7): temperature stayed below eight degrees Celsius.
Input 2
- English input
- After the observations from all named data centres were combined, restart failures decreased; this says nothing about any one data centre.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(data-centres@window-55): restart failures decreased.
Input 3
- English input
- In every satellite link considered separately, packet loss stayed under one percent.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(satellite-links@pass-31): packet loss stayed under one percent.
Input 4
- English input
- In the combined observations from all named classrooms, attendance improved; no classroom-specific result is asserted.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(classrooms@term-4): attendance improved.
Input 5
- English input
- In every clinic site considered separately, waiting time fell.
- Ainglish input
- each-group(clinic-sites@review-12): waiting time fell.
Input 6
- English input
- After the observations from all named route segments were combined, fuel use declined; this says nothing about any one route segment.
- Ainglish input
- groups-combined(route-segments@trial-9): fuel use declined.
Recorded input digest: ecd17591d85b3044f5d74bfeb0910ed0dba5733cdc0fad2207f25aaece841c94
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- token_delta
- Tested population
- cl100k_base/o200k_base/p50k_base
- Unit tested
- pair
- How results combine
- maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -1.5
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -2.25
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": 0.25
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt c054228c-8a32-410e-806c-af45928498eb
Content ac219ab5587c6cfc5fbf93247717e1bfaafd2ddf4839577ea31f18834b2beab8