Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?assigned-to / accepted-by — was responsibility placed on them, or did they take it?2026-09-30 15:58 UTCassigned-to / accepted-by — was responsibility placed on them, or did they take it?2026-09-30 18:16 UTC
What was measured?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?4 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 2 to 4Counts in current evidence decisions4 tokens per declared itemReported interval: 2 to 4Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehensionEnglish comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Same recorded value
First result
128 authored task statements: 64 operative current assignments and 64 attributable deliberate acceptances; eight task domains equally weighted within each form, eight task titles per domain. Named fictional principals and bounded task references are resolved in the shared ledger.
Second result
128 authored task statements: 64 operative current assignments and 64 attributable deliberate acceptances; eight task domains equally weighted within each form, eight task titles per domain. Named fictional principals and bounded task references are resolved in the shared ledger.
Unit tested · Same recorded value
First result
one complete task assignment or acceptance statement
Second result
one complete task assignment or acceptance statement
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Second result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Same recorded value
First result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean within two equally weighted form strata per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; report both form strata"
}
Second result
{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean within two equally weighted form strata per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; report both form strata"
}
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    {
        "id": "assigned-to",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "accepted-by",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
Second result
[
    {
        "id": "assigned-to",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "accepted-by",
        "weight": 1
    }
]
First result: full recordtoken cost · 4 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-30 15:58 UTC

assigned-to / accepted-by — was responsibility placed on them, or did they take it?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
4 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 2 to 4.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

assigned-to, accepted-by

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is 4 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
assigned-to4 Not recorded
accepted-by4 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 128 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · assign-cost-001

English input
the Elm ticket summary is assigned to agent Fern by coordinator Aspen.
Ainglish input
the Elm ticket summary assigned-to(agent Fern; by=coordinator Aspen).
Condition
assigned-to

Input 2 · accept-cost-001

English input
agent Fern accepted responsibility for the Elm ticket summary in acceptance-event-001.
Ainglish input
the Elm ticket summary accepted-by(agent Fern; ref=acceptance-event-001).
Condition
accepted-by

Input 3 · assign-cost-002

English input
the Birch account reply is assigned to agent Moss by coordinator Beech.
Ainglish input
the Birch account reply assigned-to(agent Moss; by=coordinator Beech).
Condition
assigned-to

Input 4 · accept-cost-002

English input
agent Moss accepted responsibility for the Birch account reply in acceptance-event-002.
Ainglish input
the Birch account reply accepted-by(agent Moss; ref=acceptance-event-002).
Condition
accepted-by

Input 5 · assign-cost-003

English input
the Rowan help-page review is assigned to agent Reed by coordinator Cypress.
Ainglish input
the Rowan help-page review assigned-to(agent Reed; by=coordinator Cypress).
Condition
assigned-to

Input 6 · accept-cost-003

English input
agent Reed accepted responsibility for the Rowan help-page review in acceptance-event-003.
Ainglish input
the Rowan help-page review accepted-by(agent Reed; ref=acceptance-event-003).
Condition
accepted-by

Recorded input digest: 036b99ebabe3b3b057d6c9de32141c428be4461ac74c417cf98aae8e5d256d7b

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Marked statement minus concise complete English: T is assigned to A by P; A accepted responsibility for T in R. Identical task and principal references and attributable acceptance event. No bare status comparator.
Tested population
128 authored task statements: 64 operative current assignments and 64 attributable deliberate acceptances; eight task domains equally weighted within each form, eight task titles per domain. Named fictional principals and bounded task references are resolved in the shared ledger.
Unit tested
one complete task assignment or acceptance statement
How results combine
equal item mean within two equally weighted form strata per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; report both form strata

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 2
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 2
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 4
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "assigned-to",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 4,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "accepted-by",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 4,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt c7aaccfd-1452-410a-ae42-640eecd47649
Content f13a67c5d3ac65607b11ccbb0b3c04d3a4232421ac622e3f28f88f45237494c1

Second result: full recordtoken cost · 4 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-30 18:16 UTC

assigned-to / accepted-by — was responsibility placed on them, or did they take it?

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
4 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: 2 to 4.

More tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
Separate outcomes retained for all 2 declared conditions

assigned-to, accepted-by

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is 4 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 4 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original. This replication reports 4 tokens; the named original reported 4.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 128 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 128 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identityf13a67c5d3ac65607b11ccbb0b3c04d3a4232421ac622e3f28f88f45237494c1

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
ConditionReported differenceReported interval
assigned-to4 Not recorded
accepted-by4 Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 128 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1 · ex-20260930-assigned-to-001

English input
the Nimbus password reset is assigned to agent Ada by coordinator Imani.
Ainglish input
the Nimbus password reset assigned-to(agent Ada; by=coordinator Imani).
Condition
assigned-to

Input 2 · ex-20260930-accepted-by-001

English input
agent Ada accepted responsibility for the Nimbus password reset in acceptance-event-701.
Ainglish input
the Nimbus password reset accepted-by(agent Ada; ref=acceptance-event-701).
Condition
accepted-by

Input 3 · ex-20260930-assigned-to-002

English input
the Porcelain troubleshooting guide is assigned to agent Benoit by coordinator Jules.
Ainglish input
the Porcelain troubleshooting guide assigned-to(agent Benoit; by=coordinator Jules).
Condition
assigned-to

Input 4 · ex-20260930-accepted-by-002

English input
agent Benoit accepted responsibility for the Porcelain troubleshooting guide in acceptance-event-702.
Ainglish input
the Porcelain troubleshooting guide accepted-by(agent Benoit; ref=acceptance-event-702).
Condition
accepted-by

Input 5 · ex-20260930-assigned-to-003

English input
the Linen access response is assigned to agent Chandra by coordinator Keiko.
Ainglish input
the Linen access response assigned-to(agent Chandra; by=coordinator Keiko).
Condition
assigned-to

Input 6 · ex-20260930-accepted-by-003

English input
agent Chandra accepted responsibility for the Linen access response in acceptance-event-703.
Ainglish input
the Linen access response accepted-by(agent Chandra; ref=acceptance-event-703).
Condition
accepted-by

Recorded input digest: 3bf59c109273e92a3a8eee70f9e8e37764313f50c4f7722306ecceeacce83eff

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes
Compared with
Marked statement minus concise complete English: T is assigned to A by P; A accepted responsibility for T in R. Identical task and principal references and attributable acceptance event. No bare status comparator.
Tested population
128 authored task statements: 64 operative current assignments and 64 attributable deliberate acceptances; eight task domains equally weighted within each form, eight task titles per domain. Named fictional principals and bounded task references are resolved in the shared ledger.
Unit tested
one complete task assignment or acceptance statement
How results combine
equal item mean within two equally weighted form strata per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean; report both form strata

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": 2
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": 2
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": 4
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "assigned-to",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 4,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "accepted-by",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.5,
        "value": 4,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 1d1b00b3-61bc-4a10-b772-a6866200217d
Content 4e528aedb3154fab00e429c7c192efe435ea4e9e2103c87f22dd832845443c73

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.