First result · 2026-09-05 19:31 UTC
part-chosen(<rule>) / part-capped(<limiter>) — was the edge of the set you examined your decision or the instrument's?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -9 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -9 to -9.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- Separate outcomes retained for all 16 declared conditions
part-chosen:invoices,part-chosen:parcels,part-chosen:records,part-chosen:folders,part-chosen:images,part-chosen:entries,part-chosen:sensors,part-chosen:cases,part-capped:invoices,part-capped:parcels,part-capped:records,part-capped:folders,part-capped:images,part-capped:entries,part-capped:sensors,part-capped:casesAn overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Confirmed by eligible settlement
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -9 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 8 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Confirmed by eligible settlement.
Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?
| Condition | Reported difference | Reported interval |
|---|---|---|
part-chosen:invoices | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:parcels | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:records | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:folders | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:images | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:entries | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:sensors | -8 | Not recorded |
part-chosen:cases | -8 | Not recorded |
part-capped:invoices | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:parcels | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:records | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:folders | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:images | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:entries | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:sensors | -10 | Not recorded |
part-capped:cases | -10 | Not recorded |
A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–6 of 16 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- The inspected set S-0-0 contains 23 of the 204 invoices; the rest were not inspected. I deliberately limited the inspection to this set by rule-invoices-0; I did not want to inspect further.
- Ainglish input
- The inspected set S-0-0 contains 23 of the 204 invoices; the rest were not inspected. part-chosen(rule-invoices-0): S-0-0.
- Condition
- part-chosen:invoices
Input 2
- English input
- The inspected set S-0-0 contains 23 of the 204 invoices; the rest were not inspected. quota-invoices-0, not my choice, limited the inspection to this set; I would have inspected further without that limit.
- Ainglish input
- The inspected set S-0-0 contains 23 of the 204 invoices; the rest were not inspected. part-capped(quota-invoices-0): S-0-0.
- Condition
- part-capped:invoices
Input 3
- English input
- The inspected set S-1-0 contains 32 of the 226 parcels; the rest were not inspected. I deliberately limited the inspection to this set by rule-parcels-0; I did not want to inspect further.
- Ainglish input
- The inspected set S-1-0 contains 32 of the 226 parcels; the rest were not inspected. part-chosen(rule-parcels-0): S-1-0.
- Condition
- part-chosen:parcels
Input 4
- English input
- The inspected set S-1-0 contains 32 of the 226 parcels; the rest were not inspected. quota-parcels-0, not my choice, limited the inspection to this set; I would have inspected further without that limit.
- Ainglish input
- The inspected set S-1-0 contains 32 of the 226 parcels; the rest were not inspected. part-capped(quota-parcels-0): S-1-0.
- Condition
- part-capped:parcels
Input 5
- English input
- The inspected set S-2-0 contains 41 of the 248 records; the rest were not inspected. I deliberately limited the inspection to this set by rule-records-0; I did not want to inspect further.
- Ainglish input
- The inspected set S-2-0 contains 41 of the 248 records; the rest were not inspected. part-chosen(rule-records-0): S-2-0.
- Condition
- part-chosen:records
Input 6
- English input
- The inspected set S-2-0 contains 41 of the 248 records; the rest were not inspected. quota-records-0, not my choice, limited the inspection to this set; I would have inspected further without that limit.
- Ainglish input
- The inspected set S-2-0 contains 41 of the 248 records; the rest were not inspected. part-capped(quota-records-0): S-2-0.
- Condition
- part-capped:records
Recorded input digest: 8c315bfb2d912fc36e5174b4e2095f51fcb5eee8856a1a66113d9cabff84f131
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- Current registered forms minus concise complete English carrying the same event, direction, scope, force and known quantities; no unqualified ambiguous substitute
- Tested population
- 16 prospective authored coverage claims across all eight declared domains. One chosen and one capped complete claim per domain; all known numerator and denominator information retained. Not random natural prose.
- Unit tested
- one complete scoped claim or operation, including identical surrounding context
- How results combine
- Declared weighted condition means within each tokenizer; maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable) across cl100k_base and o200k_base. Bounds are tokenizer member span, not a population confidence interval.
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -9
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -9
}
]
Condition results
[
{
"id": "part-chosen:invoices",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:parcels",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:records",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:folders",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:images",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:entries",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:sensors",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-chosen:cases",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -8,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:invoices",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:parcels",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:records",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:folders",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:images",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:entries",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:sensors",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
},
{
"id": "part-capped:cases",
"weight": 1,
"share": 0.0625,
"value": -10,
"value_lo": null,
"value_hi": null,
"arms": null,
"resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
}
]
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt cc066309-c33f-418d-b2dc-f503ebc36925
Content f9e53686a823125f64a328c264c9b49089eaebece8ab9a5e9c7c6464a21172c5