Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	verified(<how>; checked_at=<ts>; ttl=<dur>) / settled(<proof>; <checker>) / refuted(<proof2>; <checker2>) / unverified - per-question states, declared screen surface2026-09-12 09:14 UTC	verified(<how>; checked_at=<ts>; ttl=<dur>) / settled(<proof>; <checker>) / refuted(<proof2>; <checker2>) / unverified - per-question states, declared screen surface2026-09-12 09:26 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-6 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -7.75 to -6Counts in current evidence decisions	-6 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -7.75 to -6Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.	Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Same recorded value

First result

32 authored archive claim reports across four equal-weight marker forms

Second result

32 authored archive claim reports across four equal-weight marker forms

Unit tested · Same recorded value

First result

pair

Second result

pair

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Same recorded value

First result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "maximum tokenizer mean"
}

Second result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "maximum tokenizer mean"
}

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    {
        "id": "verified",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "settled",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "refuted",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "unverified",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

Second result

[
    {
        "id": "verified",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "settled",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "refuted",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "unverified",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

First result: full recordtoken cost · -6 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-12 09:14 UTC

verified(<how>; checked_at=<ts>; ttl=<dur>) / settled(<proof>; <checker>) / refuted(<proof2>; <checker2>) / unverified - per-question states, declared screen surface

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-6 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -7.75 to -6.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions

verified, settled, refuted, unverified

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -6 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`verified`	2	Not recorded
`settled`	-9	Not recorded
`refuted`	-12	Not recorded
`unverified`	-5	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: For archive-check-204: probe-318 passed at 2026-09-12T03:00Z; reliance on that check lasts 2h from then.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-204: verified(probe-318; checked_at=2026-09-12T03:00Z; ttl=2h).
Condition: verified

Input 2

English input: For archive-check-204: receipt-472 demonstrates discharge and is resolvable by reviewer-586, who is not the claimant.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-204: settled(receipt-472; reviewer-586).
Condition: settled

Input 3

English input: For archive-check-204: receipt-472 demonstrates non-discharge and is resolvable by reviewer-586, who is not the claimant.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-204: refuted(receipt-472; reviewer-586).
Condition: refuted

Input 4

English input: For archive-check-204: Discharge has been demonstrated neither way.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-204: unverified.
Condition: unverified

Input 5

English input: For archive-check-205: probe-319 passed at 2026-09-12T03:17Z; reliance on that check lasts 3h from then.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-205: verified(probe-319; checked_at=2026-09-12T03:17Z; ttl=3h).
Condition: verified

Input 6

English input: For archive-check-205: receipt-473 demonstrates discharge and is resolvable by reviewer-587, who is not the claimant.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-205: settled(receipt-473; reviewer-587).
Condition: settled

Recorded input digest: 4509c2cc3e01b1e678016cbda10c23bcde1b58ea06170b58e816ec48f492f054

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: registered four-state claim reports versus complete concise English
Tested population: 32 authored archive claim reports across four equal-weight marker forms
Unit tested: pair
How results combine: maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -7.75
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -7.75
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -6
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "verified",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": 2,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "settled",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -9,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "refuted",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -12,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "unverified",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt ce604bd4-f957-449f-88a4-5cd0682e44d1
Content 82fa939239ea7bfd849f11ba42eadf2d9ed113077495d60ddc05b7440685b694

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -6 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-12 09:26 UTC

verified(<how>; checked_at=<ts>; ttl=<dur>) / settled(<proof>; <checker>) / refuted(<proof2>; <checker2>) / unverified - per-question states, declared screen surface

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-6 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -7.75 to -6.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions

verified, settled, refuted, unverified

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

This headline is within the allowance. The reported difference is -6 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -6 tokens; the named original reported -6.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

0 of 32 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 32 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

82fa939239ea7bfd849f11ba42eadf2d9ed113077495d60ddc05b7440685b694

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`verified`	2	Not recorded
`settled`	-9	Not recorded
`refuted`	-12	Not recorded
`unverified`	-5	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 32 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: For archive-check-500: probe-800 passed at 2026-09-12T06:00Z; reliance on that check lasts 2h from then.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-500: verified(probe-800; checked_at=2026-09-12T06:00Z; ttl=2h).
Condition: verified

Input 2

English input: For archive-check-500: receipt-900 demonstrates discharge and is resolvable by reviewer-1000, who is not the claimant.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-500: settled(receipt-900; reviewer-1000).
Condition: settled

Input 3

English input: For archive-check-500: receipt-900 demonstrates non-discharge and is resolvable by reviewer-1000, who is not the claimant.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-500: refuted(receipt-900; reviewer-1000).
Condition: refuted

Input 4

English input: For archive-check-500: Discharge has been demonstrated neither way.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-500: unverified.
Condition: unverified

Input 5

English input: For archive-check-501: probe-801 passed at 2026-09-12T06:17Z; reliance on that check lasts 3h from then.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-501: verified(probe-801; checked_at=2026-09-12T06:17Z; ttl=3h).
Condition: verified

Input 6

English input: For archive-check-501: receipt-901 demonstrates discharge and is resolvable by reviewer-1001, who is not the claimant.
Ainglish input: For archive-check-501: settled(receipt-901; reviewer-1001).
Condition: settled

Recorded input digest: 953e5270f252f472406eb0b249201a93aa0423c81917af0e890812b6c990bd79

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: registered four-state claim reports versus complete concise English
Tested population: 32 authored archive claim reports across four equal-weight marker forms
Unit tested: pair
How results combine: maximum tokenizer mean

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -7.75
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -7.75
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -6
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "verified",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": 2,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "settled",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -9,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "refuted",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -12,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "unverified",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -5,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt d2ecd4dd-3ec1-402c-ae9a-0b3c0b26cbbd
Content 49e30c8f45506f9eff0207d1b145dfe1320a880ac18e4e12a0e0dcc2f553891a

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.