Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve2026-09-01 09:01 UTCtext-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve2026-09-17 18:36 UTC
What was measured?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?-27.083333333333 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -27.166666666667 to -27.083333333333Counts in current evidence decisions-27 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -27 to -27Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehensionEnglish comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
token_delta
Second result
token_delta
English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]
Second result
[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordtoken cost · -27.083333333333 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-01 09:01 UTC

text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-27.083333333333 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -27.166666666667 to -27.083333333333.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Confirmed by eligible settlement.

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
You must append section 4 to the release appendix while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of licence@c81§4 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Append section 4 to the release appendix, text-fixed(licence@c81§4).

Input 2

English input
You must carry the signed statement into the incident archive while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of statement@19e without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Carry the signed statement into the incident archive, text-fixed(statement@19e).

Input 3

English input
You must publish the checksum ledger in the verification bundle while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of ledger@7b4¶8 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Publish the checksum ledger in the verification bundle, text-fixed(ledger@7b4¶8).

Input 4

English input
You must mirror the configuration stanza in the recovery guide while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of config@44a:L12-L18 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Mirror the configuration stanza in the recovery guide, text-fixed(config@44a:L12-L18).

Input 5

English input
You must insert the witness transcript into the case packet while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of transcript@f20¶3 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Insert the witness transcript into the case packet, text-fixed(transcript@f20¶3).

Input 6

English input
You must copy the calibration protocol into the lab notebook while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of protocol@912§6 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Copy the calibration protocol into the lab notebook, text-fixed(protocol@912§6).

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -27.166666666666667850904559600166976451873779296875
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -27.08333333333333570180911920033395290374755859375
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt cebc336d-2f05-438c-9a79-c8892d528e46
Content 5bf75744f3ade84487258137d7fa43d3f25c75c314e8d5452936230948c52011

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -27 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-09-17 18:36 UTC

text-fixed(ref) / meaning-fixed(ref) — declare which invariants a referenced passage must preserve

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
Reported result
-27 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -27 to -27.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison
English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions
Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
Named instruments
cl100k_base, o200k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?
No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -27 tokens; the named original reported -27.083333333333.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

  • 0 of 24 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
  • 0 of 24 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity5bf75744f3ade84487258137d7fa43d3f25c75c314e8d5452936230948c52011
Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 24 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input
You must append the emergency contact notice to the station guide while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of notice@u14§2 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Append the emergency contact notice to the station guide, text-fixed(notice@u14§2).

Input 2

English input
You must carry the signed consent statement into the trial record while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of consent@p63¶5 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Carry the signed consent statement into the trial record, text-fixed(consent@p63¶5).

Input 3

English input
You must mirror the licence preamble in the distribution bundle while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of licence@m28:L3-L9 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Mirror the licence preamble in the distribution bundle, text-fixed(licence@m28:L3-L9).

Input 4

English input
You must reproduce the ballot instruction in the election archive while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of ballot@k51¶4 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Reproduce the ballot instruction in the election archive, text-fixed(ballot@k51¶4).

Input 5

English input
You must publish the calibration formula in the instrument manual while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of formula@c72§8 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Publish the calibration formula in the instrument manual, text-fixed(formula@c72§8).

Input 6

English input
You must insert the medical disclaimer into the participant letter while reproducing the exact decoded Unicode text of disclaimer@h09¶6 without changing any character, case, punctuation, spacing, line break, spelling, or normalization form.
Ainglish input
req: Insert the medical disclaimer into the participant letter, text-fixed(disclaimer@h09¶6).

Recorded input digest: bfe77d6b1c17b70201cf57080338575f7aec9fcda3933179d59635f9e73a338e

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -27
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -27
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt 66de059d-2bd9-41c0-a15f-445f0dce94e1
Content 7fb04000a729fbacaace518bee0482c094f410bb8d53d0c327fb85e9c618fad0

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.