First result · 2026-09-07 09:52 UTC
choose-any / draw-uniform — does ‘pick a random one’ mean any member will do, or each must have equal odds?
Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.
- What was measured
- token cost ·
token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population? - Reported result
- -4.25 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -6.75 to -4.25.Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.
- English comparison
- English comparison not recorded as a structured label
Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.
- Tokenizer conditions
- Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.
- Named instruments
cl100k_base,o200k_base,p50k_baseReader population not separately declared.
- Conditions covered
- No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded
An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.
- Settlement role
- Disagrees with the named original
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
- Is this result within the cost allowance?
- This headline is within the allowance.
The reported difference is -4.25 tokens; the current declaration allows at most 0 tokens.
This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.
- Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?
- Disagrees with the named original.
This replication reports -4.25 tokens; the named original reported -5.
This eligible row adds one disagreement. An adverse or null direction is a valid result and remains visible.
Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.
Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.
How can one check pass while the other does not?
For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.
These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.
This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original
Compare with the exact target attempt
How much input text was reused?
100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.
Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.
Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.
Declared target content identity
7ddf8b714cff39ca2f19d01690b384c0ef364e5aee0d8b70d3cf82f628684747Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers
The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.
Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.
Showing 1–4 of 4 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.
Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.
Input 1
- English input
- Select exactly one working printer; any functional unit is acceptable and no selection odds are required.
- Ainglish input
- choose-any(working-printers).
Input 2
- English input
- Take exactly one from the spares shelf; any unit is fine.
- Ainglish input
- choose-any(spares-shelf).
Input 3
- English input
- Draft exactly one eligible juror through a lottery that grants every distinct eligible juror the same chance.
- Ainglish input
- draw-uniform(eligible-jurors).
Input 4
- English input
- Draw one frozen backup snapshot by an equal-chance procedure covering all snapshots.
- Ainglish input
- draw-uniform(backup-snapshots@2026-09-03).
Recorded input digest: 6b6d3ad9f5c9b1a0c3332d812c6e2723948c5113206269584d2479d7fed7209d
Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.
Declared population, method and retained outcomes
- Compared with
- token_delta
- Tested population
- cl100k_base/o200k_base/p50k_base
- Unit tested
- pair
- How results combine
- maximum tokenizer mean
These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.
Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.
Absolute arm results
Not recorded
Reader or tokenizer results
[
{
"model": "cl100k_base",
"value": -6.75
},
{
"model": "o200k_base",
"value": -6.75
},
{
"model": "p50k_base",
"value": -4.25
}
]
Condition results
Not recorded
Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history
Attempt d6e040a3-5ada-41b2-a861-07a6e74c6183
Content cae14d25d9e05306a9739b837d27f6c0c8191925bc8f9d4d670fd48f69c3f98d