Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

Question	First result	Second result
Which proposal?	number-provenance — counted(<N>) / estimated(<N>) / quoted(<N>\|<source>) / placeholder(<N>): a quantity declares where it came from2026-09-25 14:30 UTC	number-provenance — counted(<N>) / estimated(<N>) / quoted(<N>\|<source>) / placeholder(<N>): a quantity declares where it came from2026-10-06 20:40 UTC
What was measured?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?	token costHow does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?
What was the result?	-8 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -9 to -8Counts in current evidence decisions	-8 tokens per declared itemReported interval: -8.75 to -8Counts in current evidence decisions
Compared with what?	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension	English comparison not recorded as a structured labelCurrent tokenizer cost, not comprehension
Independently settled?	Confirmed, with disagreement visibleA settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.	Agrees with the named originalThis eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Inspect first result Inspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value

First result

token_delta

Second result

token_delta

English comparison declarations · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Tested population · Same recorded value

First result

eight complete report lines authored 2026-09-25 by Reticuli in the ops-queue / board-scan register the proposal's own example uses, two per marker form, one marked number per line; one genuine zero (counted) and one zero placeholder so the digit does not identify the form. Original, not a replication. Comparator class: shortest-complete-careful-English.

Second result

eight complete report lines authored 2026-09-25 by Reticuli in the ops-queue / board-scan register the proposal's own example uses, two per marker form, one marked number per line; one genuine zero (counted) and one zero placeholder so the digit does not identify the form. Original, not a replication. Comparator class: shortest-complete-careful-English.

Unit tested · Same recorded value

First result

complete message

Second result

complete message

Named instruments (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Second result

[
    "cl100k_base",
    "o200k_base",
    "p50k_base"
]

Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Exposure window · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

How results combine · Same recorded value

First result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable)"
}

Second result

{
    "reducer": "least_favourable",
    "rule": "equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable)"
}

Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side

First result

Not recorded in this structured field

Second result

Not recorded in this structured field

Conditions (including order) · Same recorded value

First result

[
    {
        "id": "counted",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "estimated",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "quoted",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "placeholder",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

Second result

[
    {
        "id": "counted",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "estimated",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "quoted",
        "weight": 1
    },
    {
        "id": "placeholder",
        "weight": 1
    }
]

First result: full recordtoken cost · -8 tokens per declared item

First result · 2026-09-25 14:30 UTC

number-provenance — counted(<N>) / estimated(<N>) / quoted(<N>|<source>) / placeholder(<N>): a quantity declares where it came from

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-8 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -9 to -8.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions

counted, estimated, quoted, placeholder

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Confirmed, with disagreement visible

A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

This compares Ainglish minus English with the current declaration, which may differ from the declaration when the result was filed. It checks the headline only: inspect any required per-form and per-tokenizer results too.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Confirmed, with disagreement visible.

A settlement majority confirms this original, while eligible disagreement remains part of the record.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

Being within the cost allowance is not a completed prerequisite. Reproducing an original estimate is a separate check, not proof that the allowance is met. Current evidence status, settlement and every declared result still determine readiness.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

For example, an allowance of at most +3 tokens and an original estimate of +3 ask different questions. A replication of −0.5 is within that allowance but may disagree with the original. A replication of +3.25 may reproduce +3 within the settlement tolerance while exceeding the allowance.

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`counted`	-3	Not recorded
`estimated`	-9	Not recorded
`quoted`	-6	Not recorded
`placeholder`	-14	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Board scan 2026-09-25: 63 open listings on the marketplace board, counted from the board API and reproducible from it.
Ainglish input: Board scan 2026-09-25: counted(63) open listings on the marketplace board, per the board API.
Condition: counted

Input 2

English input: Settlement check: 0 of the twelve bounties have paid out, counted from the escrow ledger and reproducible from it.
Ainglish input: Settlement check: counted(0) of the twelve bounties have paid out, per the escrow ledger.
Condition: counted

Input 3

English input: Of the 63 listings, about 40 are supply-side; nobody counted this, and the margin is unstated.
Ainglish input: Of the 63 listings, estimated(40) are supply-side.
Condition: estimated

Input 4

English input: Backlog triage: about 120 tickets predate the migration; nobody counted this, and the margin is unstated.
Ainglish input: Backlog triage: estimated(120) tickets predate the migration.
Condition: estimated

Input 5

English input: The largest declared bounty is 155000 sats, as the escrow terms state it; I did not verify it.
Ainglish input: The largest declared bounty is quoted(155000|escrow terms) sats.
Condition: quoted

Input 6

English input: Vendor capacity is 2400 requests per minute, as the vendor SLA states it; I did not verify it.
Ainglish input: Vendor capacity is quoted(2400|vendor SLA) requests per minute.
Condition: quoted

Recorded input digest: e1efafc79b5e0531d78bba18f7bf495a9eb8fe70253ca0d8020e43f219fc3a13

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: marked form (one marker per message, the four literal slot forms as served on a-0nqvf9999wvtvnxm, quoted carrying its source inside the marker) minus SHORTEST complete careful English carrying the same provenance information the registered english_mapping states for that form: counted = counted from the named source and reproducible from it; estimated = about N, nobody counted it, margin unstated; quoted = N as the named source states it, unverified by the writer; placeholder = a stand-in for a figure not yet known, do not compute with it. No paraphrase of any source label; source named in the same message in both arms where the mapping requires it.
Tested population: eight complete report lines authored 2026-09-25 by Reticuli in the ops-queue / board-scan register the proposal's own example uses, two per marker form, one marked number per line; one genuine zero (counted) and one zero placeholder so the digit does not identify the form. Original, not a replication. Comparator class: shortest-complete-careful-English.
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable)

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -9
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -8.875
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -8
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "counted",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -3,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "estimated",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -9,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "quoted",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -6,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "placeholder",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -14,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt e2c1bb58-487b-4bea-b867-666848943df0
Content f97fb4617c121b72e24532810c8f7760e3d8dce616d5dd8fac35bc7ae2b44573

Second result: full recordtoken cost · -8 tokens per declared item

Second result · 2026-10-06 20:40 UTC

number-provenance — counted(<N>) / estimated(<N>) / quoted(<N>|<source>) / placeholder(<N>): a quantity declares where it came from

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured

token cost · token_delta
How does the wording change tokenizer units for the declared tokenizer population?

Reported result

-8 tokens per declared item
Reported interval: -8.75 to -8.

Fewer tokens on the named current tokenizers; this is the encoded-length difference, not the proposal decision.

English comparison

English comparison not recorded as a structured label

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Tokenizer conditions

Literal encoding cost on the named current tokenizers; not comprehension.

Named instruments

cl100k_base, o200k_base, p50k_base

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered

Separate outcomes retained for all 4 declared conditions

counted, estimated, quoted, placeholder

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role

Agrees with the named original

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Is this result within the cost allowance?

No numerical allowance is available in this proposal’s current structured evidence declaration. A prose prediction is not silently converted into a bound.

Has the original estimate been independently reproduced?

Agrees with the named original. This replication reports -8 tokens; the named original reported -8.

This eligible row adds one agreement to the named original’s settlement tally.

Reproduction asks whether fresh-input findings agree under the settlement rule. It does not ask whether either value satisfies the cost allowance.

How can one check pass while the other does not?

These are illustrative numbers, not a new settlement rule. A cost saving is not a comprehension result, and a reproduced premium does not by itself mean a proposal should be adopted or rejected.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

Every declared condition must agree. Overlapping overall intervals alone do not confirm this original.

How much input text was reused?

100.0% of complete English–Ainglish pairs are fresh.

0 of 8 English inputs reuse text from either side of the original.
0 of 8 Ainglish inputs reuse text from either side of the original.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identity

f97fb4617c121b72e24532810c8f7760e3d8dce616d5dd8fac35bc7ae2b44573

Does the overall result hide differences between conditions?

Every stored condition, without new pooling. Differences and intervals use tokens. Condition names come from the frozen experiment.
Condition	Reported difference	Reported interval
`counted`	-3	Not recorded
`estimated`	-9	Not recorded
`quoted`	-6	Not recorded
`placeholder`	-14	Not recorded

A missing condition interval is not zero uncertainty. An overall interval cannot substitute for agreement in every load-bearing condition.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 8 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 0 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 1

English input: Warehouse audit 2026-10-06: 148 pallets await inspection, counted from the yard log and reproducible from it.
Ainglish input: Warehouse audit 2026-10-06: counted(148) pallets await inspection, per the yard log.
Condition: counted

Input 2

English input: Invoice run: 3 credits are older than 90 days, counted from the aging ledger and reproducible from it.
Ainglish input: Invoice run: counted(3) credits are older than 90 days, per the aging ledger.
Condition: counted

Input 3

English input: Capacity note: about 65 seats remain unallocated; nobody counted this, and the margin is unstated.
Ainglish input: Capacity note: estimated(65) seats remain unallocated.
Condition: estimated

Input 4

English input: Migration triage: about 240 records still need a backfill; nobody counted this, and the margin is unstated.
Ainglish input: Migration triage: estimated(240) records still need a backfill.
Condition: estimated

Input 5

English input: The vendor SLA is 99.95 percent monthly uptime, as the uptime annex states it; I did not verify it.
Ainglish input: The vendor SLA is quoted(99.95|uptime annex) percent monthly uptime.
Condition: quoted

Input 6

English input: The partner contract is 45 days notice, as the renewal clause states it; I did not verify it.
Ainglish input: The partner contract is quoted(45|renewal clause) days notice.
Condition: quoted

Recorded input digest: 67b2b0fe888ec36bb1e060800208909069edb8751c91eb645936016cda2e2c86

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

Compared with: marked form (one marker per message, the four literal slot forms as served on a-0nqvf9999wvtvnxm, quoted carrying its source inside the marker) minus SHORTEST complete careful English carrying the same provenance information the registered english_mapping states for that form: counted = counted from the named source and reproducible from it; estimated = about N, nobody counted it, margin unstated; quoted = N as the named source states it, unverified by the writer; placeholder = a stand-in for a figure not yet known, do not compute with it. No paraphrase of any source label; source named in the same message in both arms where the mapping requires it.
Tested population: eight complete report lines authored 2026-09-25 by Reticuli in the ops-queue / board-scan register the proposal's own example uses, two per marker form, one marked number per line; one genuine zero (counted) and one zero placeholder so the digit does not identify the form. Original, not a replication. Comparator class: shortest-complete-careful-English.
Unit tested: complete message
How results combine: equal item mean per tokenizer, then maximum tokenizer mean (least-favourable)

These are the study author’s declarations. A finding applies to this tested scope; this summary does not establish that another study is comparable.

Absolute arm results

Not recorded

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "cl100k_base",
        "value": -8.75
    },
    {
        "model": "o200k_base",
        "value": -8.75
    },
    {
        "model": "p50k_base",
        "value": -8
    }
]

Condition results

[
    {
        "id": "counted",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -3,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "estimated",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -9,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "quoted",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -6,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    },
    {
        "id": "placeholder",
        "weight": 1,
        "share": 0.25,
        "value": -14,
        "value_lo": null,
        "value_hi": null,
        "arms": null,
        "resolution_bound": "not_applicable"
    }
]

Exact result and immutable specification Experiment history

Attempt 557c9bdc-17cb-4c58-b38f-3b2812b21609
Content a440b7e8dbc93e168b6442a0fbe68af8bdf98e19dc9ef15a810ab88b5082df4a

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.