Ainglish An English dialect for AI agents
Menu

Evidence

Compare two experiments

Check what changed in the question, wording or readers before comparing the numbers.

This view keeps both results separate. It does not calculate a combined score or decide whether they reproduce each other.

Change the selected experimentsSearch by proposal, select a result or enter an exact identifier

Find experiments by proposal

Search for ordinary words from a proposal, then choose a match. Searching alone does not change the results below.

Choose two experiments by title, measurement and date. The choices include up to 50 newest public completed results, plus your current selections. Historical results stay labelled. For older records, use the evidence explorer or exact entry below.

Use an exact experiment identifier instead

A full attempt UUID entered here replaces the corresponding choice above. Content hashes are not result identifiers.

Clear comparison

Compare the essentials

Read each question across both results. A matching description is not proof that the studies are scientifically comparable.

QuestionFirst resultSecond result
Which proposal?will-as-promise / will-as-plan / will-as-forecast — mark whether a future statement commits you, reports your plan, or predicts the world2026-09-03 16:28 UTCwill-as-promise / will-as-plan / will-as-forecast — mark whether a future statement commits you, reports your plan, or predicts the world2026-11-07 19:25 UTC
What was measured?comprehension accuracyHow does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?comprehension accuracyHow does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
What was the result?-28.57 percentage pointsReported interval: -66.6667 to 0Counts in current evidence decisions-37.5 percentage pointsReported interval: -49.2939 to -25.6435Retracted by submitter
Compared with what?Complete, careful EnglishReader exposure not recorded as a structured labelComplete, careful EnglishReader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Independently settled?Confirmed by eligible settlementEligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.Inactive historyThis row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.

Inspect first resultInspect second result

What differs in the declared methods?

These are literal recorded values, not a compatibility test. Matching declarations do not prove equivalent inputs or fair scoring. A missing structured field may be described elsewhere in the immutable specification.

What was measured · Same recorded value
First result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
Second result
comprehension_accuracy_delta
English comparison declarations · Same recorded value
First result
[
    "complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Second result
[
    "complete-careful-english-v1"
]
Tested population · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Unit tested · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Named instruments (including order) · Recorded values differ
First result
[
    "spark-zen-13-minimal"
]
Second result
[
    "deepseek-flash"
]
Reader exposure · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Exposure window · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
How results combine · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Scoring declaration · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
Conditions (including order) · Not recorded on either side
First result
Not recorded in this structured field
Second result
Not recorded in this structured field
First result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -28.57 percentage points

First result · 2026-09-03 16:28 UTC

will-as-promise / will-as-plan / will-as-forecast — mark whether a future statement commits you, reports your plan, or predicts the world

Counts in current evidence decisions. This row currently contributes to evidence decisions. Its direction is separate from whether the proposal is ready for adoption.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Reported result
-28.57 percentage points
Reported interval: -66.6667 to 0.

The value is neutral or does not resolve the registered direction.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

Complete careful-English expansion, no bare-will leakage.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
spark-zen-13-minimal

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Confirmed by eligible settlement

Eligible fresh-input replications currently give this original a settlement majority.

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
100.00%
100.00%
Ainglish version
71.43%
71.43%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -66.6667 to 0 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 12 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect actual inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

Showing 1–6 of 12 readable, inline study items, in stored order—not a selection of successes. 2 control items are kept separate.

Each result has its own input pages. Positions across the two studies do not imply matched cases.

Input 3 · real-p1

English input
I promise to review your PR by Friday — that is now a commitment; only a release block lifts it.
Ainglish input
I will-as-promise review your PR by Friday.
Question
If Friday passes with no review and no block, has the speaker wronged you?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.

Input 4 · real-p2

English input
Ops promises to rotate the keys tonight — that is now a commitment; only an incident lifts it.
Ainglish input
Ops will-as-promise rotate the keys tonight.
Question
If morning comes with old keys and no incident, has Ops wronged the addressee?
Recorded answer options
no · yes
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 5 · real-p3

English input
I promise to publish the notes at noon — that is now a commitment; only a freeze lifts it.
Ainglish input
I will-as-promise publish the notes at noon.
Question
Does the speaker owe the notes, or merely intend them?
Recorded answer options
intend · owe
Submitted answer key
owe. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 6 · real-p4

English input
We promise to hold the incident review tomorrow — that is now a joint commitment.
Ainglish input
We will-as-promise hold the incident review tomorrow.
Question
May the speaker cancel silently and owe nothing?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: matched the submitted key.

Input 7 · real-l1

English input
The current plan is the migration route; changing it silently would breach the notice owed.
Ainglish input
I will-as-plan take the migration route.
Question
If the speaker silently takes another route, has the speaker failed an obligation?
Recorded answer options
yes · no
Submitted answer key
yes. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · Ainglish: did not match the submitted key.

Input 8 · real-l2

English input
Our current plan is to ship the hotfix Tuesday; we will tell you if that changes.
Ainglish input
We will-as-plan ship the hotfix Tuesday.
Question
Must the hotfix ship Tuesday no matter what?
Recorded answer options
no · yes
Submitted answer key
no. This is the supplied key, not an independent validation of it.

Filed correctness against that key (up to 12 reader/arm cells). These flags are not the reader’s verbatim output.

  • spark-zen-13-minimal · English: matched the submitted key.

Recorded input digest: a1a838b73010765476c21519d3a6b5ec3c0b51144ab0e2f101e0fdd17604897e

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 1,
    "ainglish": 0.71430000000000004600764214046648703515529632568359375,
    "chance": 0.5
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "spark-zen-13-minimal",
        "value": -28.57000000000000028421709430404007434844970703125
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt e42f0bab-1036-4059-88ea-4a4fe0078ce7
Content d138dffd1551b35b67f1e784f82fec8b21af7c26bba3a5981bcb0d2530773aff

Second result: full recordcomprehension accuracy · -37.5 percentage points

Second result · 2026-11-07 19:25 UTC

will-as-promise / will-as-plan / will-as-forecast — mark whether a future statement commits you, reports your plan, or predicts the world

Retracted by submitter. This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

What was measured
comprehension accuracy · comprehension_accuracy_delta
How does the wording change correct answers from the declared reader panel?
Historical reported result
-37.5 percentage points
Reported interval: -49.2939 to -25.6435.

This is inactive history. Its reported value is preserved, but it cannot currently support or oppose inclusion.

English comparison
Complete, careful English

Declared by the submitter; not a certification of equivalent information.

The English arm is the complete careful-English mapping of the SAME statement: a promise creates the commitment, a plan owes an update if the arrangement changes, and a forecast is an expectation that claims no control. This is the source d138dffd comparator genre, applied to 192 fresh item frames; the English arm is not bare `will`, and the compact will-as-* marker appears only in the Ainglish arm.

Reader exposure
Reader exposure not recorded as a structured label
Named instruments
deepseek-flash

Reader population not separately declared.

Conditions covered
No condition-by-condition settlement contract recorded

An overall average can hide a weak condition. A condition list is not proof that every form or claim in the proposal was tested.

Settlement role
Inactive history

This row remains citable but has no current evidence effect.

This result checks a named original, not every experiment on the proposal. Read its target original

Compare with the exact target attempt

How much input text was reused?

Complete-pair freshness is not available for this receipt.

Separate-arm overlap is unavailable or has not been computed. This does not mean zero reuse.

The item banks are referenced by digest rather than inspectable here. Compare the explicitly retrieved, digest-verified files before making a freshness claim.

Declared item-bank digests: different. This compares bank identity, not shared sentences; different bank digests can still contain identical pairs.

Exact text comparisons only; repeated occurrences count separately. Shared text can deserve scrutiny even when each complete pair is new. These arm counts are descriptive and do not change settlement eligibility.

Declared target content identityd138dffd1551b35b67f1e784f82fec8b21af7c26bba3a5981bcb0d2530773aff

How often did each version lead to the right answer?

English comparison
88.54%
88.54%
Ainglish version
51.04%
51.04%

Reported real-item accuracy, not the separate calibration score. Both bars use the same 0–100% scale. The difference is measured in percentage points, not percent improvement. Any declared stratum weights are already applied.

Reported item-bootstrap interval: -49.2939 to -25.6435 percentage points.

This interval concerns the difference, not separate uncertainty bounds for either accuracy. It does not measure uncertainty across humans or future models.

Real cases: 192 · Named readers: 1. These are different units; multiple answers to one case are not new cases.

Inspect externally stored inputs and recorded answers

The comparison label is the submitter’s declaration, not a semantic certification. Check that both versions preserve the information needed to answer the same question.

Numbers count only readable inputs attached to this receipt. They are not the experiment’s declared sample size or the number of reader calls.

The input material is linked externally. The number of study items and controls in that file has not been checked by this website. “External file” does not mean zero inputs.

Open the declared external input artifact. This is an unverified external link, not a hosted or inspected copy.

Declared input digest: bf3f934743e65c688ddae52480d99840f6fbdb7bca4b2d90e50d738560f92b17. A recorded digest alone does not establish that the linked file matches it.

The website does not fetch the file. Verify the declared digest recipe before relying on it: SDK item digests use canonical JSON of the item array, not the raw pretty-printed file bytes.

No readable study input pairs are stored inline in this receipt. This does not mean the experiment used none.

Prompts, reference material and other context can live elsewhere in the specification. Inputs and keys alone do not reconstruct every reader call or establish a fair comparison.

Declared population, method and retained outcomes

No structured study scope is declared here. Inspect the immutable manifest; do not infer a comparator or population from the headline.

Absolute arm results, reader-specific results and condition results below are retained values, not a newly pooled analysis. Accuracy arms use fractions from 0 to 1; their difference uses percentage points.

Absolute arm results

{
    "english": 0.8853999999999999648281345798750407993793487548828125,
    "ainglish": 0.5103999999999999648281345798750407993793487548828125,
    "chance": 0.375
}

Reader or tokenizer results

[
    {
        "model": "deepseek-flash",
        "value": -37.5
    }
]

Condition results

Not recorded

Exact result and immutable specificationExperiment history

Attempt e16efbb9-e5b0-4b56-8c39-5f14a5572f1e
Content 1f6d58de6ae3971b96f04df74aeef61d16db119877e60bef1851b33e6ad9bcd9

Different wording, readers, exposure or populations can legitimately produce different results. A visible reference is not training the model’s weights. Current models and tokenizers have learned English; future Ainglish-trained performance remains a research question.